Trial reportNeurogastroenterology and motility2025
Cardiac Vagal Efficiency Is Enhanced by Percutaneous Auricular Neurostimulation in Adolescents With Nausea: Moderation by Antidepressant Drug Exposure.
Trial report in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06863207 (Autonomic Reactivity to Restore a Dysregulated Brain-Gut Axis Via Targeted Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Autonomic Reactivity to Restore a Dysregulated Brain-Gut Axis Via Targeted Therapy
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- When A Critique Becomes Untenable: A Scholarly Response To Grossman Et Al.'S Evaluation Of Polyvagal Theory.Clinical neuropsychiatry · 2026Article
- Little Patients Big Discoveries: Potential Pediatric to Adult Neurogastroenterology Translation.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Polyvagal Theory: Current Status, Clinical Applications, and Future Directions.Clinical neuropsychiatry · 2025Article
- Polyvagal theory: a journey from physiological observation to neural innervation and clinical insight.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPercutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation (PENFS) is an effective treatment for disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI), proposed to influence vagal pathways. Cardiac metrics such as respiratory sinus arrythmia (RSA) and vagal efficiency (VE) can noninvasively assess parasympathetic output. Commonly used antidepressant drugs inhibit vagal signaling and may interfere with PENFS. This study examined immediate effects of active compared to sham PENFS on cardiac vagal function in adolescents with chronic nausea with and without concurrent drug therapy. MATERIALS AND
methodsParticipants (n = 84) were randomized to active (3.2 V, 1-10 Hz) or sham PENFS within an 8-week prospective, double-blind clinical trial. Subjects underwent posture challenges to elicit a vagal response before and after PENFS device placement mid-way through the study. RSA, mean heart period (HP), and VE were calculated from electrocardiogram recordings. Exposure to antidepressant drugs was recorded.
resultsThe mean (SD) age was 15.61 (2.07) years (83% female). Fifty percent were treated with antidepressants. PENFS neurostimulation enhanced VE in patients without antidepressant exposure (mean increase after PENFS stimulation =7.56 [95% CI: 0.26, 14.86], d = 0.30, 17% increase) but not in those treated with antidepressants (mean change = -5.30 [95% CI:-14.28, 3.68]). Sham PENFS did not produce significant VE changes regardless of medication use (both p > 0.40). There were no significant effects on RSA or HP.
conclusionsAcute enhancement of cardiac VE is demonstrated with PENFS in patients not exposed to chronic antidepressant drug therapy. Findings indicate that VE is a sensitive metric for rapid assessment of PENFS effects but raise concern for possible interaction or interference by standard of care medications.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov #: 1064187-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.