Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39888143›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2025

Multiplex single-cell profiling of putative cancer stem cell markers ALDH1, SOX9, SOX2, CD44, CD133 and CD15 in endometrial cancer.

Hilde E Lien, Marta E Hjelmeland, Hege F Berg, Rose M Gold, Kathrine Woie, Lars A Akslen, Ingfrid S Haldorsen, Camilla Krakstad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hilde E LienDepartment of Clinical Science, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7814-9786
Marta E HjelmelandDepartment of Clinical Science, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Norway.
Hege F BergDepartment of Clinical Science, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Norway.
Rose M GoldDepartment of Clinical Science, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Norway.
Kathrine WoieDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Lars A AkslenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Norway.
Ingfrid S HaldorsenDepartment of Radiology, Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Camilla KrakstadDepartment of Clinical Science, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0174-8139

Funding

Helse Vest 27804Kreftforeningen 223283Norges Forskningsråd 223250Norges Forskningsråd 326348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of cancer stem cells is linked to aggressive disease and higher risk of recurrence, and multiple markers have been proposed to detect cancer stem cells. However, a detailed evaluation of the expression patterns and the prognostic value of markers relevant for endometrial cancer is lacking. As organoid models are suggested to be enriched in cancer stem cells, such models may prove valuable to define tissue-specific cancer stem cells. To address this, imaging mass cytometry and multiplex single-cell analyses were performed on an endometrial cancer patient series including both tumor biopsies and corresponding patient-derived organoids. An antibody panel focused on cancer stem cell markers was used to identify cancer stem cell phenotypes. Over 70% of epithelial cells in the tumor biopsies expressed at least one putative cancer stem cell marker. We identified distinct cancer cell phenotypes with heterogeneous expression within individual patients and between patient samples. Few differences in the distribution of cancer cell phenotypes were observed between tumor biopsies and corresponding organoids. Cells expressing aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) were more prevalent in high-grade tumors, while expression of CD44 was more prevalent in grade 1 tumors. Spatial analysis revealed significantly less interaction between ALDH1- and CD44-expressing cells. Gene expression data was used to further investigate selected markers. CD44 gene expression was associated with a favorable prognosis and was further validated using immunohistochemistry. High expression of CD44 was significantly associated with better survival. The general high expression of proposed stem cell markers may indicate alternative roles for these in endometrial cancer.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorEndometrial NeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsSingle-Cell AnalysisAC133 AntigenAgedAldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 FamilyFemaleHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsIsoenzymesMiddle AgedRetinal DehydrogenaseSOX9 Transcription FactorSOXB1 Transcription FactorsAC133 AntigenAldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 FamilyALDH1A1 protein, humanBiomarkers, TumorCD44 protein, humanHyaluronan ReceptorsIsoenzymesPROM1 protein, humanRetinal DehydrogenaseSOX2 protein, humanSOX9 protein, humanSOX9 Transcription FactorSOXB1 Transcription Factorscancer stem cellsendometrial cancerimaging mass cytometrypatient‐derived organoidssingle celltumor heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID39888143
PMCPMC12161474

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.