ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025
Labour diagnostics using the intrauterine pressure through sound waves emitted by a smartphone.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Labour commencement diagnosis is still challenging in obstetrics. The majority of scientific techniques that were used to determine labour are costly and require a professional healthcare personnel to be carried out. Hence, in this work, an experiment was conducted using a 3D-printed 50% scale model of the abdomen of an average 40-week pregnant woman. The aim was to test whether the internal pressure can be evaluated from the reflection of the sound waves emitted by a smartphone. Frequencies of 4 kHz and 20 kHz were triggered at multiple distances (0.17, 0.34, 0.51 m) after inflating the 3D-printed model with water. The reflection coefficients and internal pressure were determined to have a positive linear correlation, suggesting that the hypothesis is practical. However, as the distances decreased, the reflection coefficient plateaued, indicating that the material had attained its maximum reflection coefficient at that frequency. Due to its reduced error and non-audible properties as compared to 4Hz, 20 kHz was suggested to be an optimum frequency for measuring pressure, allowing it for pain-free application for an extended amount of time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.