ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2025
Targets Selection for Precision Therapy of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: the Latest Advancements.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Elranatamab Versus Teclistamab in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Real-World Propensity Score-Matched Study.Targeted oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
opinion statementAccording to the guidelines, the primary treatment for multiple myeloma is still based on drugs such as carfilzomib, lenalidomide, or daratumumab. However, patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) may be insensitive or develop resistance to the above therapeutic medications. Thus, formulating standardized and rational treatment regimens for such patients remains an area for consideration. Multidrug combinations are available for the therapy of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma to improve their clinical outcome and prevent the occurrence of multidrug resistance. For instance, combination therapy with immunomodulators, proteasome inhibitors, and CD38 monoclonal antibodies. With the development of genomics and molecular diagnostic technologies, RRMM has entered the era of precision therapy. Targeted immunotherapeutic drugs such as monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) cells have shown promising clinical response rates and favorable safety profiles in several clinical and experimental studies. These cutting-edge medicinal treatments may provide new hope for a cure for RRMM. However, the choice of treatment regimen still needs to adhere to the principle of individualization. Generally, we recommend treatment with drugs of a new generation or novel mechanism of action for patients with RRMM who are first relapsed, such as next-generation proteasome inhibitors, next-generation immunomodulators, and CD38-based monoclonal antibody regimens. For multiple relapsed RRMM, we recommend choosing a combination regimen or participating in relevant clinical trials. Additionally, monoclonal antibodies have become the standard of care for patients with RRMM. With the introduction of CAR-T therapy, ADCs, and bispecific antibodies, RRMM patients are expected to achieve deep remissions and long-term survival again.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39888475What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.