Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39888556›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

Which Training Intensity Distribution Intervention will Produce the Greatest Improvements in Maximal Oxygen Uptake and Time-Trial Performance in Endurance Athletes? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data.

Michael A Rosenblat, Jennifer A Watt, Jem I Arnold, Gunnar Treff, Øyvind B Sandbakk, Jonathan Esteve-Lanao, Luca Festa, Luca Filipas, Stuart D Galloway, Iker Muñoz and 7 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Michael A RosenblatSylvan Adams Sport Institute, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. michael@evidencebasedcoaching.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-3045-2177
Jennifer A WattKnowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jem I ArnoldSchool of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Gunnar TreffInstitute for Molecular Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Øyvind B SandbakkDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Centre for Elite Sports Research, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Jonathan Esteve-LanaoAll In Your Mind Training System, Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico.
Luca FestaItalian Cycling Federation FCI, Rome, Italy.
Luca FilipasDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Stuart D GallowayPhysiology, Exercise and Nutrition Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK.
Iker MuñozDepartment of Physical Activity and Sports, Faculty of Education and Sports, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.
Domingo J Ramos-CampoLFE Research Group, Department of Health and Human Performance, Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Science-INEF, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Patrick SchneeweissMedical Clinic, Department of Sports Medicine, University of Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Sergio Sellés-PérezGeneral Didactic and Specific Didactics Department, Faculty of Education, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Thomas StögglRed Bull Athlete Performance Center, Salzburg, Austria.
Rune K TalsnesDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Centre for Elite Sports Research, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Christoph ZinnerDepartment of Sport, University of Applied Sciences for Police and Administration of Hesse, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Stephen SeilerDepartment of Sport Science and Physical Education, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndurance athletes tend to accumulate large training volumes, the majority of which are performed at a low intensity and a smaller portion at moderate and high intensity. However, different training intensity distributions (TID) are employed to maximize physiological and performance adaptations.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis of individual participant data to compare the effect of different TID models on maximal oxygen uptake (VO

methodsStudies were included if: (1) they were published in peer reviewed academic journals, (2) they were in English, (3) they were experimental or quasi-experimental studies, (4) they included trained endurance athletes, (5) they compared a polarized (POL) TID intervention to a comparator group that utilized a different TID model, (6) the duration in each intensity domain could be quantified, and (7) they reported VO

resultsWe included 13 studies with 348 (n = 296 male, n = 52 female) recreational (n = 150) and competitive (n = 198) endurance athletes. Mean age ranged from 17.6 to 41.5 years and VO

conclusionsOur results indicate that the adaptations to VO

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceEndurance TrainingOxygen ConsumptionPhysical Conditioning, HumanPhysical EnduranceAthletesHumans

Identifiers

PMID39888556

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.