Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39888565›Full record

ReviewCancer metastasis reviews2025

Minimally invasive biomarkers for triaging lung nodules-challenges and future perspectives.

Waqar Ahmed Afridi, Samandra Hernandez Picos, Juliana Muller Bark, Danyelle Assis Ferreira Stamoudis, Sarju Vasani, Darryl Irwin, David Fielding, Chamindie Punyadeera

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer metastasis reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Risk prediction of non-small cell lung cancer in patients with pulmonary nodules: a single-center cohort study based on six machine learning algorithms.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. A guide to cancer screening.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Waqar Ahmed AfridiSaliva and Liquid Biopsy Translational Laboratory, Institute for Biomedicine and Glycomics (IBG), Griffith University, Brisbane, 4111, Australia.
Samandra Hernandez PicosSaliva and Liquid Biopsy Translational Laboratory, Institute for Biomedicine and Glycomics (IBG), Griffith University, Brisbane, 4111, Australia.
Juliana Muller BarkSaliva and Liquid Biopsy Translational Laboratory, Institute for Biomedicine and Glycomics (IBG), Griffith University, Brisbane, 4111, Australia.
Danyelle Assis Ferreira StamoudisSaliva and Liquid Biopsy Translational Laboratory, Institute for Biomedicine and Glycomics (IBG), Griffith University, Brisbane, 4111, Australia.
Sarju VasaniDepartment of Otolaryngology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, 4006, Australia.
Darryl IrwinThe Agena Biosciences, Bowen Hills, Brisbane, 4006, Australia.
David FieldingThe Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, 4006, Australia.
Chamindie PunyadeeraSaliva and Liquid Biopsy Translational Laboratory, Institute for Biomedicine and Glycomics (IBG), Griffith University, Brisbane, 4111, Australia. c.punyadeera@griffith.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-9039-8259

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP 2002576The Metro North collaborative research grant scheme CRG-324-2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CT chest scans are commonly performed worldwide, either in routine clinical practice for a wide range of indications or as part of lung cancer screening programs. Many of these scans detect lung nodules, which are small, rounded opacities measuring 8-30 mm. While the concern about nodules is that they may represent early lung cancer, in screening programs, only 1% of such nodules turn out to be cancer. This leads to a series of complex decisions and, at times, unnecessary biopsies for nodules that are ultimately determined to be benign. Additionally, patients may be anxious about the status of detected lung nodules. The high rate of false positive lung nodule detections has driven advancements in biomarker-based research aimed at triaging lung nodules (benign versus malignant) to identify truly malignant nodules better. Biomarkers found in biofluids and breath hold promise owing to their minimally invasive sampling methods, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness. Although several biomarkers have demonstrated clinical utility, their sensitivity and specificity are still relatively low. Combining multiple biomarkers could enhance the characterisation of small pulmonary nodules by addressing the limitations of individual biomarkers. This approach may help reduce unnecessary invasive procedures and accelerate diagnosis in the future. This review offers a thorough overview of emerging minimally invasive biomarkers for triaging lung nodules, emphasising key challenges and proposing potential solutions for biomarker-based nodule differentiation. It focuses on diagnosis rather than screening, analysing research published primarily in the past five years with some exceptions. The incorporation of biomarkers into clinical practice will facilitate the early detection of malignant nodules, leading to timely interventions and improved outcomes. Further efforts are needed to increase the cost-effectiveness and practicality of many of these applications in clinical settings. However, the range of technologies is advancing rapidly, and they may soon be implemented in clinics in the near future.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorLung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesSolitary Pulmonary NoduleEarly Detection of CancerHumansTriageBiomarkers, TumorArtificial intelligenceBiomarkersEarly diagnosisLung nodulesMinimally invasive biopsiesRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID39888565
PMCPMC11785609

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.