SynthesisMedicine2025
Meta-analysis on the primary approach: Aspiration versus stent retrieval for internal carotid artery occlusion.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Direct Aspiration as First-Line Technique for Acute Intracranial Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion: Preliminary Results.Neurointervention · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies have not provided consistent findings regarding the efficacy of aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy in patients with acute internal carotid artery occlusion. This study aimed to evaluate the preferable endovascular technique (aspiration or stent retriever) and the impact of stent retriever utilization on both clinical and angiographic outcomes.
methodsWe collected potential scholarly articles from a variety of databases including the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. The search spanned from the establishment of electronic databases up to March 2024. Additionally, gray literature was sourced from the references cited in the included literature reports. Statistical analysis of the combined data was performed using STATA version 11.0 (Stata Corporation, TX).
resultsOur analysis comprises a total of 4 studies, involving 759 participants in total. Among these individuals diagnosed with internal carotid artery occlusion, 435 were assigned to the aspiration group, while 324 were designated to the stent retriever group. The findings indicated a significant increase in the rate of successful reperfusion in the stent retriever group compared to the aspiration group. Furthermore, it was observed that the incidence of overall complications, intracerebral hemorrhage, embolization formation, puncture to reperfusion time, and onset to reperfusion time in the stent retriever group did not significantly exceed that in the aspiration group.
conclusionIn our review on intracranial internal carotid artery occlusion, stent retrievers outperformed direct aspiration in achieving successful reperfusion. However, further studies evaluating the effects of different approaches to internal carotid artery clot removal are required to confirm these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.