ArticleMedicine2025
Causal effects of circulating immune cells on coronary atherosclerosis: Evidence from Mendelian randomization.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Intertwined and unequal causality of type 1 diabetes and autoimmune thyroid disease: Insights from Mendelian randomization.Medicine · 2025Article
- Prognostic implications of systemic immune-inflammation index and systemic inflammation response index in hemodialysis patients.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of circulating immune cells in coronary atherosclerosis remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the causal effects of various immune cells on coronary atherosclerosis using Mendelian randomization (MR). Circulating immune cell datasets were obtained from genome-wide association studies, and coronary atherosclerosis datasets were obtained from FinnGen. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms satisfying the assumptions of association, independence, and exclusivity were screened in the datasets and analyzed using MR, with inverse-variance weighted as the main method. Horizontal pleiotropy, heterogeneity, and sensitivity analyses were performed using the MR-Egger, Cochran Q, and leave-one-out analyses, respectively. The MR analysis showed that effector memory double negative (DN) (cluster of differentiation [CD]4-CD8-) %DN (odds ratio [OR]: 1.042, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.008-1.077, P = .014), CD4 on CD39+ CD4+ (OR: 1.027, 95% CI: 1.001-1.054, P = .040), C-X3-C motif chemokine receptor 1 on CD14+ CD16- monocytes (OR: 1.035, 95% CI: 1.010-1.060, P = .006), C-C chemokine receptor 7 on naive CD4+ (OR: 1.035, 95% CI: 1.006-1.076, P = .023), and immunoglobulin D- CD38- %lymphocytes (OR: 1.098, 95% CI: 1.016-1.187, P = .019) were associated with an increased genetic susceptibility to coronary atherosclerosis, with no horizontal pleiotropy (P ≥ .05). Cochran Q showed no heterogeneity (P ≥ .05), and the sensitivity analysis indicated that the results were robust. The MR analysis revealed various markers and immune cell subsets, including effector memory DN (CD4-CD8-) %DN, CD4 on CD39+ CD4+, C-X3-C motif chemokine receptor on CD14+ CD16- monocytes, C-C chemokine receptor 7 on naive CD4+, and IgD- CD38- %lymphocytes, associated with increased genetic susceptibility to coronary atherosclerosis. This provides a genetic explanation for the role of specific immune cells in inducing and exacerbating coronary artery disease and offers new ideas for the exploration of immune markers and immune-targeted drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.