ArticlePreventive medicine2025
Cholesterol screening by nativity status in pediatric patients receiving care in United States community-based clinics.
Article in Preventive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAccumulation of cardiovascular risks begins early in life. Some experts recommend cholesterol screening for children aged nine to 11. Latinos living in the U.S. have a high burden of cardiovascular disease and risk factors, and this is further influenced by birthplace, yet information on early screening for cardiovascular disease in this group is sparse.
methodsWe used electronic health records from a national network including 771 community-based clinics across 21 states from 2012 to 2020, from 310,297 foreign-born Latino, US-born Latino, Latino with unknown birthplace, and non-Hispanic white patients aged nine to 17 years. Logistic regression including demographic and clinical covariates was conducted to estimate prevalence of cholesterol testing, stratified by obesity.
resultsLatino children, regardless of nativity status, had higher adjusted prevalence of cholesterol screening compared to non-Hispanic white children for those with and without obesity. The highest prevalence of screening among those with obesity was in foreign-born Latinos (34.8 %), and among those who were not obese, US-born Latinos had the highest screening prevalence (16.8 %).
conclusionsCholesterol screening was low overall in these community-based clinic patients but differed by ethnicity and nativity status. There is opportunity for further research on outcomes in Latino children to inform guidelines for early screening for cardiovascular health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.