ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2025
Evolocumab safety and efficacy in hypercholesteremia patients with or without diabetes: a retrospective real-world analysis.
Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Abnormal lipid metabolism in senescent renal tubular cells in diabetic nephropathy.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Review
- Advancing Lipid Management: Saudi Heart Association Position Statement on PCSK9-targeted Therapies in the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors effectively reduce LDL cholesterol and adverse cardiovascular events with a safety profile comparable to a placebo. Limited real-world data exists on their effectiveness in different patient groups. This study evaluated evolocumab's efficacy and safety in hypercholesteremia patients with and without diabetes.
methodIn a large tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia, patients aged 18 and above who initiated evolocumab therapy were screened for eligibility between January 2017 and July 2023. All patients who had been on maximally tolerated statin and ezetimibe therapy for at least 4 months before starting evolocumab were included. The included participants were then divided into diabetic and non-diabetic groups and assessed for evolocumab's efficacy and safety. Efficacy was measured by LDL-C reduction and target achievement, while safety was assessed by examining glycemic control changes, new-onset diabetes (NOD) and hepatic enzyme levels. Data analysis included descriptive and comparative methods, with significance set at p < 0.05.
resultsA total of 151 patients were included, with an average age of 51.77 years. The majority of patients were male (67.6%) and obese (81.5%). Around 55% had diabetes, and 63% had established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease at baseline. During a mean follow-up period of 13.17 months, the average reduction in LDL-C from baseline was - 34.21, - 28.66, and - 39.61% for the overall cohort, non-diabetic patients, and diabetic patients, respectively. In the overall cohort, 34.4 and 24.5% reached the target LDL-C levels of less than 1.4 mmol/L (55 mg/dL) and less than 1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL), respectively. Worsening of glycemic control (HbA1C increase > 0.5) was observed in 25.83% of the overall cohort, 16.18% of non-diabetics, and 33.74% of diabetics. An HbA1C increase > 1 was observed in 13.25% of the overall cohort, 2.94% in non-diabetics and 21.69% in diabetics. Five patients (3.3%) developed NOD.
conclusionThe study demonstrated that the addition of evolocumab to maximally tolerated statin and ezetimibe therapy reduced LDL-C levels but with a smaller average reduction and a lower proportion of patients achieving recommended LDL-C targets than in landmark clinical trials. Additionally, there was a potential negative effect on glycemic control, warranting further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.