ArticleTrials2025
Distribution of trial registry numbers within full-text of PubMed Central articles: implications for linking trials to publications and indexing trial publication types.
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Studies on allergic diseases and B cells in the past 20 years: a bibliometric analysis via CiteSpace and VOSviewer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Research Trends and Hotspots in Mendelian Randomization Studies of Liver Diseases: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis.Hepatic medicine : evidence and research · 2026Review
- Issues regarding the Indexing of Adaptive Clinical Trial Articles.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLinking registered clinical trials with their published results continues to be a challenge. A variety of natural language processing (NLP)-based and machine learning-based models have been developed to assist users in identifying these connections. To date, however, no system has attempted to detect mentions of registry numbers within the full-text of articles.
methodsArticles from the PubMed Central full-text Open Access dataset were scanned for mentions of ClinicalTrials.gov and international clinical trial registry identifiers. We analyzed the distribution of trial registry numbers within sections of the articles and characterized their publication type indexing and other metrics.
resultsRegistry numbers mentioned in article metadata (e.g., the abstract) or in the Methods section of full-text are highly predictive of clinical trial articles. When a clinical trial article mentioned ClinicalTrials.gov identifier numbers (NCT) only in the Methods section, in every case examined, it was reporting clinical outcomes from that registered trial, and thus can reliably be used to link that trial to that publication. Conversely, registry numbers mentioned in Tables arise almost entirely from reviews (including systematic reviews and meta-analyses). Registry numbers mentioned in other full-text sections have relatively little predictive value for linking trials to their publications. Clinical trial articles that mention CONSORT or SPIRIT guidelines have a higher rate of mentioning registry numbers in article metadata, and hence are more easily linked to their underlying trials, than articles overall.
conclusionsThe appearance and location of trial registry numbers within the full-text of biomedical articles provide valuable features for connecting clinical trials to their publications. They also potentially provide information to assist automated tools in assigning publication types to articles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.