Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39891770›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurology2025

Towards a biological view of multiple sclerosis from early subtle to clinical progression: an expert opinion.

Massimo Filippi, Maria Pia Amato, Carlo Avolio, Paolo Gallo, Claudio Gasperini, Matilde Inglese, Girolama Alessandra Marfia, Francesco Patti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Big data in multiple sclerosis.Current opinion in neurology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Massimo FilippiNeurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy. filippi.massimo@hsr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5485-0479
Maria Pia AmatoUniversity of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Carlo AvolioDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Paolo GalloUniversity of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Claudio GasperiniAzienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy.
Matilde IngleseDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Girolama Alessandra MarfiaMultiple Sclerosis Clinical and Research Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata, Department of Systems Medicine, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Francesco PattiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, GF Ingrassia, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classification of multiple sclerosis (MS) into the two distinct phases of relapsing-remitting and progressive, including primary progressive and secondary progressive phenotypes (PPMS and SPMS, respectively) has long been accepted; however, there are several unmet needs associated with this particular model. The observation that both inflammation and neurodegeneration are present from the onset of MS has resulted in a paradigm shift towards MS as a disease continuum driven by pathological mechanisms underlying clinical progression. Here we report the results from a meeting of Italian MS specialists, exploring the evolving perception of MS pathobiology and its implications for diagnosis and treatment. Insights garnered from the expert panel advocate for a redefined understanding of MS. This expert opinion paper reviews the disease continuum and the intertwined nature of inflammatory and neurodegenerative processes. Also, the need for changes in diagnostic criteria and treatment strategies, including the development of novel biomarkers and new therapies targeting smouldering disease, is discussed.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionMultiple SclerosisHumansBruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitorItalyMultiple sclerosisProgression independent of relapse activityRelapseSmouldering multiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID39891770
PMCPMC11787267

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.