Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39891995›Full record

ReviewEBioMedicine2025

Synapse vulnerability and resilience underlying Alzheimer's disease.

Raquel N Taddei, Karen E Duff

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EBioMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Raquel N TaddeiNeurology Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK. Electronic address: raquel.taddei.20@ucl.ac.uk.
Karen E DuffUK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synapse preservation is key for healthy cognitive ageing, and synapse loss represents a critical anatomical basis of cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease (AD), predicting dementia onset, severity, and progression. Synapse loss is viewed as a primary pathologic event, preceding neuronal loss and brain atrophy in AD. Synapses may, therefore, represent one of the earliest and clinically most meaningful targets of the neuropathologic processes driving AD dementia. The synapse loss in AD is highly selective and targets particularly vulnerable synapses while leaving others, termed resilient, largely unaffected. Yet, the anatomic and molecular hallmarks of the vulnerable and resilient synapse populations and their association with AD neuropathologic changes (e.g. amyloid-β plaques and tau tangles) and memory dysfunction remain poorly understood. Characterising the selectively vulnerable and resilient synapses in AD may be key to understanding the mechanisms of cognitive preservation versus loss and enable the development of robust biomarkers and disease-modifying therapies for dementia.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseSynapsesAmyloid beta-PeptidesAnimalsBiomarkersBrainDisease SusceptibilityHumansAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersAlzheimer’s diseaseBiomarkersCognitionResilienceSynapse lossVulnerability

Identifiers

PMID39891995
PMCPMC11833146

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.