ArticlePregnancy hypertension2025
Home blood pressure monitoring and mobile health application practices among pregnant persons with and at risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
Article in Pregnancy hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo examine training in and current home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) practices in pregnancies with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) or risk factors for HDP; and to explore interest in using mHealth applications for communicating with healthcare providers. STUDY
designA cross-sectional survey was conducted on HBPM practices/training and interest in using mobile health (mHealth) applications among pregnant persons at an academic medical center. OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcomes measured were the proportion of participants who received training for HBPM, and the proportion interested in using mHealth applications for communication with providers related to managing HDP.
resultsOf the 103 participants, 41 (39.8%) used HBPM. Of those who did HBPM, 36.6% received training from their healthcare providers. Training more often included instructions on positioning and how to perform HBPM, and rarely included advice on validated HBPM devices. Nearly all participants (98.1%) owned a smartphone, and 19.4% had a smartwatch. A significant majority expressed interest in using a secure mobile app for communication with providers (78.6%), and 88.3% were interested in wearing a smartwatch for remote monitoring. There were no significant differences in interest levels based on race, age, residence, or education, while there was higher interest (100% vs. 67%) in mobile apps for communication among those with HDP vs. risk factors for HDP.
conclusionsDespite a low level of training for HBPM, there was high interest in using mHealth applications. Leveraging mHealth technology could help overcome the challenges of providing training for HBPM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.