Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39893063›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of anaesthesia2025

Impact of neuromuscular block monitoring and reversal on postoperative pulmonary complications in thoracic surgery: a Bayesian analysis of the iPROVE-OLV trial.

Guido Mazzinari, Oscar Díaz-Cambronero, Ignacio Garutti, Carlos Luis Errando, Carlos Ferrando, iPROVE-OLV investigators

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03182062 (Postoperative Complication and Hospital Stay Reduction With a Individualized Perioperative Lung Protective Ventilation During One-lung Ventilation), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03182062 naunknown statusnot on this map

Postoperative Complication and Hospital Stay Reduction With a Individualized Perioperative Lung Protective Ventilation During One-lung Ventilation: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundación para la Investigación del Hospital Clínico de ValenciaRan2018 to 2020Enrolled1,400ConditionsThoraric Surgery, Surgery Time Expected More Than Two HoursArmsAlveolar recruitment maneuver, PEEP Titration Trial, Lung protective ventilation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Bayesian statistics: a primer for perioperative medicine clinicians.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guido MazzinariDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain; Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria la Fe, Valencia, Spain; Department of Statistics and Operational Research, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain. Electronic address: gmazzinari@gmail.com.
Oscar Díaz-CambroneroDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain; Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria la Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Ignacio GaruttiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Luis ErrandoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario, Valencia, Spain.
Carlos FerrandoDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Hospital Clínic i Provincial, Barcelona, Spain; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
iPROVE-OLV investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are a significant concern in thoracic surgery. A modifiable factor influencing PPCs is postoperative residual neuromuscular block (NMB), which impairs respiratory muscle function.

methodsWe performed a post hoc Bayesian analysis of data from the iPROVE-OLV study, a multicentre randomised controlled trial involving patients undergoing thoracic surgery with one-lung ventilation. We compared participants managed with any neuromuscular monitoring and any reversal vs those managed without either. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a composite of PPCs within the first 7 postoperative days.

resultsOf the 698 patients included, 657 received any neuromuscular monitoring and any reversal, while 41 did not. Patients managed with any neuromuscular monitoring and any reversal had a lower incidence of PPCs (20%) compared with those without either (34%). Bayesian random effect logistic regression indicated that the use of any neuromuscular monitoring and any reversal reduced PPCs with an odds ratio (OR) ranging from 0.67 (95% credibility interval, CrI, 0.39-1.11) to 0.84 (95% CrI 0.48-1.37), depending on the prior model used. The probability of benefit (OR <1) was between 77% and 94%. Subgroup analysis indicated that sugammadex was more effective than neostigmine in reducing PPCs, with a high probability of benefit (97%), and both neuromuscular monitoring and reversal reduced PCCs when evaluated separately with a high probability of benefit.

conclusionUtilising neuromuscular monitoring and reversal agents significantly reduced the risk of PPCs in thoracic surgery. Sugammadex was more efficacious in reducing PPCs compared with neostigmine. These findings support the combined use of neuromuscular monitoring and reversal drugs. CLINICAL

trial registrationNCT03182062.

Indexed as

Lung DiseasesNeuromuscular BlockadeNeuromuscular MonitoringPostoperative ComplicationsThoracic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedBayes TheoremFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeostigmineOne-Lung VentilationNeostigmineneuromuscular blockneuromuscular monitoringone-lung ventilationpostoperative pulmonary complicationsreversal agentssugammadexthoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID39893063
PMCPMC12597387

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.