ArticleNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2025
Cardiovascular safety of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation in cervical spinal cord injury.
Article in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation for upper limb recovery in chronic incomplete cervical spinal cord injury: protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- Cumulative Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation with Locomotor Training Safely Improves Trunk Control in Children with Spinal Cord Injury: Pilot Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated whether cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) in conjunction with rehabilitation on upper extremity function alters blood pressure regulation in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury. This study is a secondary analysis of the Up-LIFT trial, a prospective single-arm multicenter trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tSCS in conjunction with rehabilitation (tSCS + rehab) on upper extremity function in individuals with chronic cervical spinal cord injury. Utilizing this large data set obtained from 60 individuals across 14 international sites, we compared blood pressure and heart rate measurements obtained before, during and after each training session during both the wash-in Rehab alone period and the tSCS + rehab period of the trial. Blood pressure and heart rate were recorded during each session throughout the protocol in all participants. Sessions of tSCS + rehab did not cause significant changes in blood pressure or heart rate compared to Rehab alone (p > 0.05). Further, blood pressure medications did not have an effect on these cardiovascular responses to tSCS (p > 0.05). This study supports the safety profile of cervical tSCS paired with rehabilitation in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury. The lack of adverse effects on blood pressure and heart rate during the intervention, together with the previously reported clinically meaningful improvements in upper extremity strength and function strongly supports the utility of tSCS in this patient population. Further work is required to elucidate potential long-term effects of targeted tSCS on cardiovascular function in people with spinal cord injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.