Evidence mapPaperPMID 39894039Full record

ReviewYonsei medical journal2025

Management of Elderly Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

Yohan Park, Won Min Hwang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Yonsei medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yohan ParkDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Konyang University Hospital, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7416-1841
Won Min HwangDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Konyang University Hospital, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon, Korea. hwangwm@kyuh.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7548-6111

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is highly prevalent among elderly patients, and as the global population ages, the number of elderly patients with CKD is increasing. Elderly patients require additional considerations beyond those required for their younger counterparts, such as comorbidities, frailty, and geriatric syndromes. In this review, we primarily focus on these additional considerations specific to elderly patients and discuss the assessment of CKD and its management strategies, including blood pressure and glycemic control; dyslipidemia, anemia, and electrolyte and metabolic acidosis management; and medication dosage, among others, as well as polypharmacy and nonpharmacological management. Furthermore, the concept of conservative kidney management and the practical recommendations of the Korean Society of Geriatric Nephrology for elderly patients with end-stage kidney disease requiring dialysis therapy are discussed. In particular, the aging rate in Korea is exceptionally high; therefore, it is crucial to pay more attention to the increase in elderly patients with CKD. A more palliative approach, rather than intensive treatment strategies, may be necessary for these patients. In a world with an abundance of information, shared decision-making with patients is of great importance, and it is essential to keep in mind that this holds true for elderly patients as well.

Indexed as

Renal Insufficiency, ChronicAgedHumansKidney Failure, ChronicRenal Dialysischronic kidney diseaseDisease managementfrail elderly

Identifiers

PMID39894039
PMCPMC11790406

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.