Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39895238›Full record

SynthesisResearch in nursing & health2025

Prioritization Patterns of Nurses in the Management of a Patient With Delirium: Results of a Q-Methodology Study.

Luisa Sist, Matteo Pezzolati, Nikita Valentina Ugenti, Silvia Cedioli, Rossella Messina, Stefania Chiappinotto, Paola Rucci, Alvisa Palese

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Research in nursing & health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Luisa SistDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1283-7364
Matteo PezzolatiAusl Romagna, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-6151-002X
Nikita Valentina UgentiSviluppo Professionale e Implementazione della Ricerca nelle Professioni Sanitarie (SPIR), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8284-2679
Silvia CedioliAusl Romagna, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-1113-5721
Rossella MessinaDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Stefania ChiappinottoDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4829-1831
Paola RucciDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7704-0831
Alvisa PaleseDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3508-844X

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nurses are required to decide on priorities; however, how they prioritize the interventions toward patients with delirium is still unclear. Therefore, expanding the knowledge on (a) how nurses prioritize interventions to manage episodes of delirium and (b) the underlying prioritization patterns were the aims of this study. The Q-methodology was applied in 2021. A systematic review to identify the recommended interventions for patients with delirium was performed, and a nominal group technique was used to select those interventions that are applicable in daily practice (35 out of 96 identified). Then, using a specific scenario, 56 clinical nurses working in hospital medical (n = 31), geriatric (n = 15), and postacute (n = 10) units were asked to order the 35 interventions (from -4 the lowest to +4 the highest priority) using a Q-sort table. Averages (confidence interval at 95%) were calculated at the group level, and a by-person factor analysis was applied to discover underlying patterns of prioritization at the overall and at the individual levels. At the group level, "Ensuring a safe environment (e.g., reducing bed height)" was ranked as the highest priority (2.29 out of four); at the individual level, three prioritization patterns accounting for a total variance of 50.21% have emerged: "Individual needs-oriented" (33.82% variance explained; 41 nurses); "Prevention-oriented" (8.47%; five nurses); and "Cognitive-oriented" (7.92%; six nurses). At the group level, nurses prioritize safety while caring for patients with delirium; however, at the individual level, they follow three different patterns of prioritization oriented toward diverse aspects, suggesting uncertainty in the actions to be taken-with potential implications for patients.

Indexed as

DeliriumNursing Staff, HospitalAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Ageddeliriumdelirium/nursingmanagementprioritizationpriority settingQ‐methodology

Identifiers

PMID39895238
PMCPMC11873757

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.