Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39895651›Full record

ReviewBJS open2024

Primary ventral and incisional hernias: comprehensive review.

Nadia A Henriksen, Heather Bougard, Mário R Gonçalves, William Hope, Ritu Khare, Jenny Shao, Andrea C Quiroga-Centeno, Eva B Deerenberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Time distribution and intraoperative workflow in complex midline incisional hernia repair.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The prehabilitation paradox in ventral hernia: from universal to personalized care.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Review
  18. Abdominal wall muscle remodeling after open transversus abdominis release: a CT-based analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nadia A HenriksenDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Diseases, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1805-9866
Heather BougardDepartment of Surgery, New Somerset Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Mário R GonçalvesDepartment of Surgery, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal.
William HopeDepartment of Surgery, Novant Health New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, North Carolina, USA.
Ritu KhareDepartment of Surgery, Kings College Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Jenny ShaoDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9182-9548
Andrea C Quiroga-CentenoDepartment of Surgery, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Eva B DeerenbergDepartment of Surgery, Franciscus en Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1421-8567

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary ventral and incisional hernias are frequent conditions that impact the quality of life of patients. Surgical techniques for ventral hernia repair are constantly evolving and abdominal wall surgery has turned into a highly specialized field.

methodsThis is a narrative review of the most recent and relevant literature on the treatment of primary ventral and incisional hernias performed by eight experts in ventral hernia surgery from across the world and includes review of classification systems, preoperative measures, descriptions of surgical techniques, and postoperative complications.

resultsRepairs of primary ventral and incisional hernias range from simple open procedures in healthy patients with small defects to complex procedures when patients are co-morbid and have large defects. Optimizing patient-related risk factors before surgery is important to decrease complication rates. Surgical repair techniques from open repairs to minimally invasive procedures are described in detail in the review. Minimally invasive techniques are technically more demanding and take longer, but decrease the risk of surgical-site infections and shorten the duration of hospital stay.

conclusionTreatment of ventral hernias aims to improve the quality of life of patients. The risks and benefits of procedures should be weighed against patients' complaints and co-morbidities. Optimizing patient-related risk factors before surgery is important.

Indexed as

Hernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyIncisional HerniaHumansLength of StayMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID39895651
PMCPMC11788674

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.