Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39895865›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic translation2025

Evaluation of biological performance of 3D printed trabecular porous tantalum spine fusion cage in large animal models.

Yiming Zhang, Jingzhou Yang, Wentao Wan, Qingqian Zhao, Mingyuan Di, Dachen Zhang, Gang Liu, Chao Chen, Xun Sun, Wei Zhang and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Yiming ZhangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Jingzhou YangInstitute of Materials Research, Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Guangdong, China.
Wentao WanDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Qingqian ZhaoDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Mingyuan DiDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Dachen ZhangShenzhen Dazhou Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Guangdong, China.
Gang LiuDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Chao ChenDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Xun SunDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Wei ZhangDepartment of Spine Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Medical University, Hebei, China.
Hanming BianDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Ye TianDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Lu XueDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Yiming DouDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Zheng WangDepartment of Orthopedics, No.1 Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qiulin LiInstitute of Materials Research, Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Guangdong, China.
Qiang YangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The materials for artificial bone scaffolds have long been a focal point in biomaterials research. Tantalum, with its excellent bioactivity and tissue compatibility, has gradually become a promising alternative material. 3D printing technology shows unique advantages in designing complex structures, reducing costs, and providing personalized customization in the manufacture of porous tantalum fusion cages. Here we report the pre-clinical large animal (sheep) study on the newly developed 3D printed biomimetic trabecular porous tantalum fusion cage for assessing the long-term intervertebral fusion efficacy and safety. Methods: Porous tantalum fusion cages were fabricated using laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) methods. The fusion cages were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and mechanical compression tests. Small-Tailed Han sheep served as the animal model, and the two types of fusion cages were implanted in the C3/4 cervical segments and followed for up to 12 months. Imaging techniques, including X-ray, CT scans, and Micro CT, were used to observe the bone integration of the fusion cages. Hard tissue sections were used to assess osteogenic effects and bone integration. The range of motion (ROM) of the motion segments was evaluated using a biomechanical testing machine. Serum biochemical indicators and pathological analysis of major organs were conducted to assess biocompatibility. Results: X-ray imaging showed that both the 3D-printed and chemical vapor deposition porous tantalum fusion cages maintained comparable average intervertebral disc heights. Due to the presence of metal artifacts, CT and Micro CT imaging could not effectively analyze bone integration. Histomorphology data indicated that both the 3D-printed and chemical vapor deposition porous tantalum fusion cages exhibited similar levels of bone contact and integration at 3, 6, and 12 months, with bone bridging observed at 12 months. Both groups of fusion cages demonstrated consistent mechanical stability across all time points. Serum biochemistry showed no abnormalities, and no significant pathological changes were observed in the heart, liver, spleen, lungs, and kidneys. Conclusion: This study confirms that 3D-printed and chemical vapor deposition porous tantalum fusion cages exhibit comparable, excellent osteogenic effects and long-term biocompatibility. Additionally, 3D-printed porous tantalum fusion cages offer unique advantages in achieving complex structural designs, low-cost manufacturing, and personalized customization, providing robust scientific support for future clinical applications. The translational potential of this article: The translational potential of this paper is to use 3D printed biomimetic trabecular porous tantalum spine fusion cage with bone trabecular structure and validating its feasibility in large animal models (sheep). This study provides a basis for further research into the clinical application of the 3D printed biomimetic trabecular porous tantalum spine fusion cage.

Indexed as

Chemical vapor depositionInterbody fusion cageLaser powder bed fusionOsteogenesisPorous tantalumSheep model

Identifiers

PMID39895865
PMCPMC11786794

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.