ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024
Spatial variations in the microbiota: comparative analysis of microbial composition and predicted functions across different intestinal segments and feces in donkeys.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comprehensive Review of the Equine Gut Microbiome in Health and Disease.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- Effects of Feeding Strategies on Gut Microbial Communities in Donkeys: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Veterinary sciences · 2025Review
- Deciphering Fungal Communities in Three Species of Phlogacanthus Nees (Acanthaceae) Using Amplicon-Metagenomic Analysis.Current microbiology · 2025Article
- Metagenomic Applications to Herbivore Gut Microbiomes: A Comprehensive Review of Microbial Diversity and Host Interactions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Advances in Donkey Disease Surveillance and Microbiome Characterization in China.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Gut microbiome regulation in equine animals: current understanding and future perspectives.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Donkeys, as single-stomach herbivores, have a complex and diverse microbial community in their digestive tracts. The intestinal bacterial community is crucial for maintaining intestinal homeostasis, as well as the host's overall nutrition and health. However, research on donkey gut microbes is relatively limited, particularly regarding the microbial colonization patterns in different intestinal segments of adult donkeys. Therefore, this study examined the abundance and function of microbiota across various sites of the intestinal tract (duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum, colon) and feces of healthy adult Dezhou male donkeys using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and PICRUSt analysis. The results indicate that donkeys have a rich gut microbial diversity and a large microbial population. No significant differences in the indices of alpha diversity were observed among the donkey's duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum, colon, and feces. A Venn diagram analysis revealed the presence of both unique (Duodenum: 4645; Jejunum: 3586; Ileum: 4904; Cecum: 4253; Colon: 6135; Feces: 4885) and shared (339) ASVs among the different sections. A principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) revealed significant differences (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.