ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2025
Exploring potential drug-drug interactions in discharge prescriptions: ChatGPT's effectiveness in assessing those interactions.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative performance of large language models and Drugs.com versus Lexicomp for antiseizure medication drug-drug interactions: A cross-sectional study with iterative prompting analysis.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
- ChatGPT as a Tool for Perioperative Safety: Evaluating Drug Interaction Detection in Anesthetic Regimens.Cureus · 2026Article
- Dosage adjustments in renal impairment among medical ward patients: ChatGPT® and DeepSeek® models' effectiveness in assessing those adjustments.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
- Leveraging Artificial Intelligence-Based Applications to Remove Disruptive Factors from Pharmaceutical Care: A Quantitative Study in Eastern Romania.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluating a large language model (ChatGPT-5) for detecting potential drug-drug interactions in intensive care: a cross-sectional comparative study with a clinical decision support system.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Drug-drug interaction identification using large language models.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of artificial intelligence platforms and drug interaction screening databases using real-world patient data.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Medication Management for Older Adults in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Narrative Review.Aging medicine (Milton (N.S.W)) · 2025Review
- Potential drug-drug interactions among hospitalised cardiac patients in Nepal: a prospective observational study.BMJ open · 2025Observational
- Learnings from research on artificial intelligence enabled solutions in clinical pharmacy practice and education.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Exploring Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use on Elderly Patients in a General Medicine Ward Using 2023 AGS Beers Criteria.Aging medicine (Milton (N.S.W)) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) pose substantial risks in clinical practice, leading to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Tools like Micromedex drug-drug interaction checker are commonly used to screen for pDDIs, yet emerging AI models, such as ChatGPT, offer the potential for supplementary pDDI prediction. However, the accuracy and reliability of these AI tools in a clinical context remain largely untested. Objective: This study evaluates pDDIs in discharge prescriptions for medical ward patients and assesses ChatGPT-4.0's effectiveness in predicting these interactions compared to Micromedex drug-drug interaction checker. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted over three months with 301 discharged patients. pDDIs were identified using Micromedex drug-drug interaction checker, detailing each interaction's occurrence, severity, onset, and documentation. ChatGPT-4.0 predictions were then analyzed against Micromedex data. Binary logistic regression analysis was applied to assess the influence of predictor variables in the occurrence of pDDIs. Results: 1551 drugs were prescribed to 301 patients, averaging 5.15 per patient. pDDIs were detected in 60.13 % of patients, averaging 3.17 pDDIs per patient, ChatGPT-4.0 accurately identified pDDIs (100 % for occurrence) but had limited accuracy for severity (37.3 %) and moderate accuracy for onset (65.2 %). The most frequent major interaction was between Cefuroxime Axetil and Pantoprazole Sodium. Polypharmacy significantly increased the risk of pDDIs (OR: 3.960, Conclusion: pDDIs are prevalent in internal medicine discharge prescriptions, with polypharmacy heightening the risk. While ChatGPT 4.0 accurately identifies pDDI occurrence, its limitations in predicting severity, onset, and documentation underscore healthcare professionals' need for careful oversight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.