Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39896339›Full record

ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2025

Development and psychometric validation of the frontline health workers' occupational risk and characteristics in emergencies index (FORCE-index) - The covid Hospital cohort study.

Synne Øien Stensland, Kristina Bondjers, John-Anker Zwart, Leiv Arne Rosseland, Dan Atar, Jan Olav Christensen, Dagfinn Matre, Kristin Alve Glad, Tore Wentzel-Larsen, Hilde Wøien and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Synne Øien StenslandNorwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Oslo, Norway.
Kristina BondjersNorwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Oslo, Norway.
John-Anker ZwartDepartment of Research and Innovation, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Leiv Arne RosselandInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.
Dan AtarInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.
Jan Olav ChristensenNational Institute of Occupational Health, Norway.
Dagfinn MatreNational Institute of Occupational Health, Norway.
Kristin Alve GladNorwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Oslo, Norway.
Tore Wentzel-LarsenNorwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Oslo, Norway.
Hilde WøienDivision of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Grete DybInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: A lack of tools for the systematic identification of frontline health workers' changing occupational risks, characteristics, and needs, poses a major barrier to supporting vital personnel to stay in practice through health emergencies and beyond. The current study reports on the development and psychometric evaluation of the Frontline health workers' Occupational Risk and Characteristics in Emergencies index (FORCE-index). Study design: The Covid hospital study is a large, multisite, four-wave, open cohort study of frontline health workers responding to the first four waves of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2022). Methods: 2496 frontline health workers responded to questionnaires assessing various aspects of their work environment. Using exploratory factor analysis, we estimated the latent structure of the FORCE-index at the first and second waves. This structure was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis at the third and fourth waves. The internal consistency of the instrument's subscales (e.g., factors) was evaluated using omega reliability, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and mean inter-item correlation. Results: A nine-factor solution provided best fit to the data. These factors mapped onto the following aspects of the work environment; competency, stress management, familiarity, workload manageability, work performance, infection safety, personal protective equipment, social safety, and social support. Internal consistency for the full FORCE-index and the nine factors was satisfactory. Conclusions: The initial psychometric validation indicates that the FORCE-index is a valid measure which can be used by health authorities, services, and institutions to adequately and systematically assess central aspects of frontline health workers' work environment that are commonly challenged in health emergencies.

Indexed as

Covid-19FrontlineHealth care workerHealth emergencyHealth PersonnelHealth responseHospitalIndexInfectious outbreakJob characteristicsOccupational diseasesOccupational exposureOccupational HealthOccupational stressPreparednessPreparedness planningPsychometricScaleStressWork environment

Identifiers

PMID39896339
PMCPMC11787489

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.