ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
Joint classification and regression with deep multi task learning model using conventional based patch extraction for brain disease diagnosis.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multimodal ConvNeXt-Tiny deep learning model for simultaneous prediction of IDH mutation and Ki-67 expression in gliomas.PloS one · 2026Article
- A severity-aware multi-task CNN-transformer framework for explainable diabetic foot ulcer triage and mobile deployment.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The best possible treatment planning and patient care depend on the precise diagnosis of brain diseases made with medical imaging information. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used in clinical score prediction and computer-aided brain disease (BD) diagnosis due to its outstanding correlation. Most modern collaborative learning methods require manually created feature representations for MR images. We present an effective iterative method and rigorously show its convergence, as the suggested goal is a non-smooth optimization problem that is challenging to tackle in general. In particular, we extract many image patches surrounding these landmarks by using data to recognize discriminative anatomical characteristics in MR images. Our experimental results, which demonstrated significant increases in key performance metrics with 500 data such as specificity of 94.18%, sensitivity of 93.19%, accuracy of 96.97%, F1-score of 94.18%, RMSE of 22.76%, and execution time of 4.875 ms demonstrated the efficiency of the proposed method, Deep Multi-Task Convolutional Neural Network (DMTCNN). Methods: In this research present a DMTCNN for combined regression and classification. The proposed DMTCNN model aims to predict both the presence of brain diseases and quantitative disease-related measures like tumor volume or disease severity. Through cooperative learning of several tasks, the model might make greater use of shared information and improve overall performance. For pre-processing system uses an edge detector, which is canny edge detector. The proposed model learns many tasks concurrently, such as categorizing different brain diseases or anomalies, by extracting features from image patches using convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Using common representations across tasks, the multi-task learning (MTL) method enhances model generalization and diagnostic accuracy even in the absence of sufficient labeled data. Results: One of our unique discoveries is that, using our datasets, we verified that our proposed algorithm, DMTCNN, could appropriately categorize dissimilar brain disorders. Particularly, the proposed DMTCNN model achieves better than state-of-the-art techniques in precisely identifying brain diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.