Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39897258›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Assessing the Potential Benefits of Stem Cell Therapy in Cardiac Regeneration for Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease.

Syed Ahsan Ali, Zahra Mahmood, Zulkiffil Mubarak, Manahil Asad, Muhammad Taha Sarfraz Chaudhri, Lamiah Bilal, Tehniat Ashraf, Tarek N Khalifa, Thasneem Ashraf, Falaknaz Saleem and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Research progress of stem cells in the treatment of atherosclerosis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  11. From Pluripotency to Patients: Making Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) Therapies Safer.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Syed Ahsan AliCardiology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, GBR.
Zahra MahmoodInternal Medicine, Akhtar Saeed Medical and Dental College, Lahore, PAK.
Zulkiffil MubarakCardiology, Fauji Foundation Hospital, Islamabad, PAK.
Manahil AsadMedicine and Surgery, Foundation University Medical College, Islamabad, PAK.
Muhammad Taha Sarfraz ChaudhriMedicine and Surgery, Fauji Foundation Hospital, Islamabad, PAK.
Lamiah BilalMedicine and Surgery, Foundation University Medical College, Islamabad, PAK.
Tehniat AshrafInternal Medicine, Bhitai Dental & Medical College, Mirpur Khas, PAK.
Tarek N KhalifaCardiology, Benha University Hospital, Alexandria, EGY.
Thasneem AshrafGeneral Practice, Cooperative Neethi Healthcare, Thrissur, IND.
Falaknaz SaleemInternal Medicine, George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust, Nuneaton, GBR.
Fathima Masharifa AhamedInternal Medicine, Ras Al Khaimah Medical and Health Sciences University, Abu Dhabi, ARE.
Shoaib TararInternal Medicine, Nishtar Medical University, Multan, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myocardial infarction, commonly known as a heart attack, or ischemic heart disease (IHD), remains one of the most fatal health conditions worldwide due to the limited regenerative capacity of the heart muscle after infarction. Conventional medical treatments primarily focus on symptom control and tissue preservation but fail to address the loss of cardiomyocytes, the cells responsible for heart contraction. This systematic review explores the hypothesis that stem cell therapies can enhance cardiac regeneration by replacing or repairing damaged myocardium, with a focus on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), and embryonic stem cells (ESCs). The review was restricted to literature published between 2015 and 2024, sourced from PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. This timeframe reflects advances in stem cell research and regenerative therapies. Findings from trials such as Bone Marrow-Derived Mononuclear Cell Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (BAMI) and Cardiopoietic Stem Cell Therapy in Heart Failure (C-CURE) suggest that stem cell therapies may improve left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and reduce infarct size. However, the heterogeneity of trials, small sample sizes, and short follow-up durations limit the generalizability of these results. Long-term benefits, including improved survival rates and reduced hospital readmissions, remain inconclusive. Ethical concerns, particularly the use of ESCs, pose additional challenges, including controversies over embryonic sources and varying regulatory landscapes. Key areas for advancement include optimizing stem cell survival and differentiation, with genetic engineering to enhance tissue repair capabilities considered the most critical for improving clinical outcomes. The integration of regenerative treatments such as extracellular vesicle therapy, derived from stem cells to modulate repair, also shows promise. Imaging techniques, such as MRI and PET, provide real-time monitoring of stem cell effects, offering insights into therapeutic efficacy and safety. Despite promising results from preclinical models and early-phase trials, the full therapeutic potential of stem cell therapy for IHD remains unrealized. Effective treatment protocols, addressing patient-specific factors, ethical considerations, and long-term outcome evaluations, are essential. This review emphasizes the need for ongoing research and clinical development to maximize the potential of stem cell-based approaches in cardiac repair.

Indexed as

cardiac regenerationcardiac tissue repairembryonic stem cells (escs)induced pluripotent stem cells (ipscs)ischemic heart diseaseleft ventricular ejection fraction (lvef)mesenchymal stem cells (mscs)myocardial infarctionregenerative medicinestem cell therapy

Identifiers

PMID39897258
PMCPMC11786102

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.