ReviewCureus2025
Assessing the Potential Benefits of Stem Cell Therapy in Cardiac Regeneration for Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stem Cells and Their Derivatives in Cardiac Fibrosis Therapy: Challenges and Perspectives.Cells · 2026Review
- Cardiac drug potential: exploring individual and combined cardiac drugs to promote differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells into cardiomyocytes.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Bioengineered Cellular and Acellular Therapies for Ischemic Heart Disease in Clinically Relevant Models.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Research advances in cryopreserved preparations of mesenchymal stem cells: technical innovations, application challenges, and quality control.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes in myocardial infarction repair: therapeutic potential and scaffold-based delivery strategies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Review
- Stem cell therapy for myocardial infarction and atherosclerosis: mechanisms, challenges, and future directions.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Cardiac Development, Cellular Composition and Function: From Regulatory Mechanisms to Applications.Cells · 2025Review
- Breaking new ground in heart failure management: novel therapies and future frontiers.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Research progress of stem cells in the treatment of atherosclerosis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- From Pluripotency to Patients: Making Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) Therapies Safer.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocardial infarction, commonly known as a heart attack, or ischemic heart disease (IHD), remains one of the most fatal health conditions worldwide due to the limited regenerative capacity of the heart muscle after infarction. Conventional medical treatments primarily focus on symptom control and tissue preservation but fail to address the loss of cardiomyocytes, the cells responsible for heart contraction. This systematic review explores the hypothesis that stem cell therapies can enhance cardiac regeneration by replacing or repairing damaged myocardium, with a focus on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), and embryonic stem cells (ESCs). The review was restricted to literature published between 2015 and 2024, sourced from PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. This timeframe reflects advances in stem cell research and regenerative therapies. Findings from trials such as Bone Marrow-Derived Mononuclear Cell Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (BAMI) and Cardiopoietic Stem Cell Therapy in Heart Failure (C-CURE) suggest that stem cell therapies may improve left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and reduce infarct size. However, the heterogeneity of trials, small sample sizes, and short follow-up durations limit the generalizability of these results. Long-term benefits, including improved survival rates and reduced hospital readmissions, remain inconclusive. Ethical concerns, particularly the use of ESCs, pose additional challenges, including controversies over embryonic sources and varying regulatory landscapes. Key areas for advancement include optimizing stem cell survival and differentiation, with genetic engineering to enhance tissue repair capabilities considered the most critical for improving clinical outcomes. The integration of regenerative treatments such as extracellular vesicle therapy, derived from stem cells to modulate repair, also shows promise. Imaging techniques, such as MRI and PET, provide real-time monitoring of stem cell effects, offering insights into therapeutic efficacy and safety. Despite promising results from preclinical models and early-phase trials, the full therapeutic potential of stem cell therapy for IHD remains unrealized. Effective treatment protocols, addressing patient-specific factors, ethical considerations, and long-term outcome evaluations, are essential. This review emphasizes the need for ongoing research and clinical development to maximize the potential of stem cell-based approaches in cardiac repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.