Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39897284›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

External Validation of the 4C (Coronavirus Clinical Characterization Consortium) Mortality Score in a Teaching Hospital in Brazil.

Karima E Bruno, Henrique Mussi, Amanda E Bruno, Juliana B Rodrigues, Manuella Rezende, Victor C Cortes, Ronaldo A Gismondi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karima E BrunoMedicina Clinica, Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro (Ebserh/Universidade Federal Fluminense), Niteroi, BRA.
Henrique MussiMedicina Clinica, Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro (Ebserh/Universidade Federal Fluminense), Niteroi, BRA.
Amanda E BrunoMedicina Clinica, Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro (Ebserh/Universidade Federal Fluminense), Niteroi, BRA.
Juliana B RodriguesMedicina Clinica, Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro (Ebserh/Universidade Federal Fluminense), Niteroi, BRA.
Manuella RezendeMedicina Clinica, Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro (Ebserh/Universidade Federal Fluminense), Niteroi, BRA.
Victor C CortesMedicina Clinica, Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro (Ebserh/Universidade Federal Fluminense), Niteroi, BRA.
Ronaldo A GismondiMedicina Clinica, Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro (Ebserh/Universidade Federal Fluminense), Niteroi, BRA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The 4C (Coronavirus Clinical Characterization Consortium) Mortality Score has demonstrated good discrimination in COVID-19 but has not been widely validated in Brazil. The 4C Mortality Score is a clinical tool developed during the COVID-19 pandemic to predict in-hospital mortality for patients admitted with COVID-19. It was derived from a large dataset of hospitalized patients in the United Kingdom and provides a simple yet effective way to stratify patients based on their risk of death. Objective This study aimed to determine the accuracy of the 4C Mortality Score in patients admitted with COVID-19 in a university teaching hospital. Methods The study was observational, longitudinal, and retrospective, conducted in a 180-bed university teaching hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. We included all patients admitted with COVID-19 and followed them until discharge. The 4C Mortality Score was calculated based on age, sex, Charlson index, respiratory rate, peripheral oxygen saturation (room air), Glasgow Coma Scale, serum urea, and C-reactive protein (CRP) level. The primary outcome was mortality. Results We included 208 participants, with a median age of 63 years. Among them, 111 (53%) were male; 52 (25%) had cardiovascular disease, and 83 (39%) had cancer. Mortality was 39.9%. Independent predictors of mortality were age, hemoglobin, CRP, mechanical ventilation, and the need for vasopressors. The 4C Mortality Score's area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) was 89.9%. Conclusion The 4C Mortality Score demonstrated excellent discrimination in a teaching hospital population.

Indexed as

covid-19covid prognosiscritical care and hospital medicinein hospital mortalityscores

Identifiers

PMID39897284
PMCPMC11786962

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.