ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Diagnostic performance of multi-branch coronary angiography-based index of microcirculatory resistance: a novel approach.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Assessment of Microvascular Function in Angina Pectoris by Angiography-Based Index of Microcirculation Resistance: A Meta-Analysis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Validation of a Novel Coronary Angiography-Derived Quantitative Functional Assessment Compared with Wire-Based FFR and IMR: The Prospective Multicenter FAIR Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Wire-based index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) utilizing pressure wires and thermodilution techniques for the assessment of coronary microcirculatory function, presents challenges for clinical routine use due to its complexity, time-consuming, and costly. This study introduces a novel multi-branch and wire-free method for IMR calculation based on coronary angiography. The diagnostic performance of CAG-IMR is validated within a retrospective single-center investigation. Methods: In a retrospective single-center study, 139 patients with 201 vessels were evaluated using CAG-IMR for coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) detection, utilizing wire-based IMR as the reference standard. CMD was determined based on wire-based IMR ≥25U. CAG-IMR was independently calculated from diagnostic coronary angiography in a blinded fashion, employing the same diagnostic threshold of 25U for CMD identification. Results: CAG-IMR demonstrated significant correlation ( Conclusions: This study introduces CAG-IMR, a novel, multi-branch and wire-free method for IMR calculation. The indicator demonstrates good diagnostic accuracy and correlation with wire-based IMR in a cohort of 139 patients and 201 vessels, with the potential to enhance clinical CMD assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.