Evidence mapPaperPMID 39897702Full record

ArticleNpj biosensing2025

A method for blood pressure hydrostatic pressure correction using wearable inertial sensors and deep learning.

David A M Colburn, Terry L Chern, Vincent E Guo, Kennedy A Salamat, Daniel N Pugliese, Corey K Bradley, Daichi Shimbo, Samuel K Sia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Npj biosensing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David A M ColburnDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 USA.
Terry L ChernDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 USA.
Vincent E GuoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 USA.
Kennedy A SalamatDepartment of Computer Science, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 USA.
Daniel N PuglieseColumbia Hypertension Center and Laboratory, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032 USA.
Corey K BradleyColumbia Hypertension Center and Laboratory, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032 USA.
Daichi ShimboColumbia Hypertension Center and Laboratory, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032 USA.
Samuel K SiaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 USA.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001873 · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · 2025 to 2025
$10.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001873
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cuffless noninvasive blood pressure (BP) measurement could enable early unobtrusive detection of abnormal BP patterns, but when the sensor is placed on a location away from heart level (such as the arm), its accuracy is compromised by variations in the position of the sensor relative to heart level; such positional variations produce hydrostatic pressure changes that can cause swings in tens of mmHg in the measured BP if uncorrected. A standard method to correct for changes in hydrostatic pressure makes use of a bulky fluid-filled tube connecting heart level to the sensor. Here, we present an alternative method to correct for variations in hydrostatic pressure using unobtrusive wearable inertial sensors. This method, called IMU-Track, analyzes motion information with a deep learning model; for sensors placed on the arm, IMU-Track calculates parameterized arm-pose coordinates, which are then used to correct the measured BP. We demonstrated IMU-Track for BP measurements derived from pulse transit time, acquired using electrocardiography and finger photoplethysmography, with validation data collected across 20 participants. Across these participants, for the hand heights of 25 cm below or above the heart, mean absolute errors were reduced for systolic BP from 13.5 ± 1.1 and 9.6 ± 1.1 to 5.9 ± 0.7 and 5.9 ± 0.5 mmHg, respectively, and were reduced for diastolic BP from 15.0 ± 1.0 and 11.5 ± 1.5 to 6.8 ± 0.5 and 7.8 ± 0.8, respectively. On a commercial smartphone, the arm-tracking inference time was ~134 ms, sufficiently fast for real-time hydrostatic pressure correction. This method for correcting hydrostatic pressure may enable accurate passive cuffless BP monitors placed at positions away from heart level that accommodate everyday movements.

Indexed as

Biomedical engineeringCardiology

Identifiers

PMID39897702
PMCPMC11785522

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.