ArticleNpj biosensing2025
A method for blood pressure hydrostatic pressure correction using wearable inertial sensors and deep learning.
Article in Npj biosensing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Height matters: re-thinking blood pressure targets through physics, physiology and evolution.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cuffless noninvasive blood pressure (BP) measurement could enable early unobtrusive detection of abnormal BP patterns, but when the sensor is placed on a location away from heart level (such as the arm), its accuracy is compromised by variations in the position of the sensor relative to heart level; such positional variations produce hydrostatic pressure changes that can cause swings in tens of mmHg in the measured BP if uncorrected. A standard method to correct for changes in hydrostatic pressure makes use of a bulky fluid-filled tube connecting heart level to the sensor. Here, we present an alternative method to correct for variations in hydrostatic pressure using unobtrusive wearable inertial sensors. This method, called IMU-Track, analyzes motion information with a deep learning model; for sensors placed on the arm, IMU-Track calculates parameterized arm-pose coordinates, which are then used to correct the measured BP. We demonstrated IMU-Track for BP measurements derived from pulse transit time, acquired using electrocardiography and finger photoplethysmography, with validation data collected across 20 participants. Across these participants, for the hand heights of 25 cm below or above the heart, mean absolute errors were reduced for systolic BP from 13.5 ± 1.1 and 9.6 ± 1.1 to 5.9 ± 0.7 and 5.9 ± 0.5 mmHg, respectively, and were reduced for diastolic BP from 15.0 ± 1.0 and 11.5 ± 1.5 to 6.8 ± 0.5 and 7.8 ± 0.8, respectively. On a commercial smartphone, the arm-tracking inference time was ~134 ms, sufficiently fast for real-time hydrostatic pressure correction. This method for correcting hydrostatic pressure may enable accurate passive cuffless BP monitors placed at positions away from heart level that accommodate everyday movements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.