Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39897847›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2025

RNA sequence analysis landscape: A comprehensive review of task types, databases, datasets, word embedding methods, and language models.

Muhammad Nabeel Asim, Muhammad Ali Ibrahim, Tayyaba Asif, Andreas Dengel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhammad Nabeel AsimGerman Research Center for Artificial Intelligence GmbH, Kaiserslautern, 67663, Germany.
Muhammad Ali IbrahimGerman Research Center for Artificial Intelligence GmbH, Kaiserslautern, 67663, Germany.
Tayyaba AsifDepartment of Computer Science, Rhineland-Palatinate Technical University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, 67663, Germany.
Andreas DengelGerman Research Center for Artificial Intelligence GmbH, Kaiserslautern, 67663, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deciphering information of RNA sequences reveals their diverse roles in living organisms, including gene regulation and protein synthesis. Aberrations in RNA sequence such as dysregulation and mutations can drive a diverse spectrum of diseases including cancers, genetic disorders, and neurodegenerative conditions. Furthermore, researchers are harnessing RNA's therapeutic potential for transforming traditional treatment paradigms into personalized therapies through the development of RNA-based drugs and gene therapies. To gain insights of biological functions and to detect diseases at early stages and develop potent therapeutics, researchers are performing diverse types RNA sequence analysis tasks. RNA sequence analysis through conventional wet-lab methods is expensive, time-consuming and error prone. To enable large-scale RNA sequence analysis, empowerment of wet-lab experimental methods with Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications necessitates scientists to have a comprehensive knowledge of both DNA and AI fields. While molecular biologists encounter challenges in understanding AI methods, computer scientists often lack basic foundations of RNA sequence analysis tasks. Considering the absence of a comprehensive literature that bridges this research gap and promotes the development of AI-driven RNA sequence analysis applications, the contributions of this manuscript are manifold: It equips AI researchers with biological foundations of 47 distinct RNA sequence analysis tasks. It sets a stage for development of benchmark datasets related to 47 distinct RNA sequence analysis tasks by facilitating cruxes of 64 different biological databases. It presents word embeddings and language models applications across 47 distinct RNA sequence analysis tasks. It streamlines the development of new predictors by providing a comprehensive survey of 58 word embeddings and 70 language models based predictive pipelines performance values as well as top performing traditional sequence encoding based predictors and their performances across 47 RNA sequence analysis tasks.

Indexed as

AI applications in genomicsArtificial intelligenceDeep learningDisease analysisGene analysisGene expression regulationGene network analysisMachine learningMulti-omicsRNA functional analysisRNA modificationsRNA sequence analysisRNA-sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39897847
PMCPMC11783440

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.