Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39897924›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

Green extraction cascade of UV-absorbing compounds, alginate, and fucoidan from

Santiago Guerrero-Higareda, Danay Carrillo-Nieves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Santiago Guerrero-HigaredaTecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Ingenieria y Ciencias, Av. General Ramón Corona No. 2514, 45201, Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico.
Danay Carrillo-NievesTecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Ingenieria y Ciencias, Av. General Ramón Corona No. 2514, 45201, Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate Caribbean Mexican seaweed as a raw material for the production of fucoidans, alginates, and bioactive extracts with antioxidant activity, total flavonoid content, total phenolic content, and UV absorbance. Extractions were first performed using varying ethanol concentrations and maceration times, with the optimal treatment selected based on its superior antioxidant activity, flavonoid and phenolic contents, and UV absorbance. The solid fraction from this treatment was then subjected to extraction using green solvents, specifically natural deep eutectic solvents (NADESs) and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), to isolate alginate and fucoidan. The green extraction cascade enables the recovery of multiple value-added products from each fraction, showcasing both versatility and sustainability. The new DES combination yielded a high amount of crude fucoidan (0.4103 ± 0.0042 g g⁻

Indexed as

Antioxidant activityCarotenoidsFlavonoid contentPhenolic compoundsSeaweed valorizationSunscreen filtersUltrasound-assisted extraction

Identifiers

PMID39897924
PMCPMC11783382

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.