ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2025
Utilization of a structured research site mentorship model to facilitate site performance in a clinical research network.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Research site mentorship has a positive impact on study enrollment. The VA Cooperative Studies Program's (CSP) Network of Dedicated Enrollment Sites (NODES) utilized an existing site mentorship model to onboard 13 new expansion sites. We describe the successes, challenges, and lessons learned during the development and implementation of this model in this paper. Methods: NODES established a "Site Mentorship/Expansion Workgroup (SWG)" in October 2020 to plan and guide the consortium on providing mentorship and services to other clinical research networks, non-Node CSP study sites, and NODES expansion sites. In 2021, the SWG developed a 12-month implementation plan to onboard 13 new sites by pairing original Node (mentor) sites with expansion Node (mentee) sites. Mentors offered prompt guidance and solutions to mentees on site-level challenges by working with them closely. Implementation of the plan occurred from February 2022 through September 2023. Results: Data from the implementation of this mentorship plan demonstrated a 32.7 % increase (from 54.8 % in 2022 to 87.5 % in 2023) in the expansion sites' achievement of their Objectives & Key Results (OKRs). From October 2020-September 2021, prior to mentorship assignments, the original sites (mentors) achieved an average of 88 % of their OKRs and attained an average of 86.7 % and 80.9 % of those OKRs in October-September of 2022 and 2023 respectively during the mentorship implementation phase. Conclusions: The results demonstrate that developing and implementing a research site mentorship model to facilitate onboarding and performance of research sites into an established network was feasible and contributed to the success of those sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.