ArticleCureus2024
Awareness of the Importance of Zinc and the Effects of Its Deficiency Among the General Population of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent decades, zinc deficiencies have emerged as a significant concern in the global health field. Zinc is important for the optimal functionality of all the body systems. Its supplementation has gained considerable traction as an essential focus, notably during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our study aimed to assess the level of awareness and knowledge regarding zinc's importance, sources, and the causes and effects of zinc deficiency. Our cross-sectional study was conducted among the general population of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, through a self-administered questionnaire. Ethical approval was obtained from the Fakeeh College Scientific Research Review Committee (Jeddah, SAU). The scoring system gives the participant 1 point for each correct answer and 0 points for every wrong answer, with the overall score being out of 20. Several demographic factors, including nationality, age, gender, healthcare status, place of residency, and marital status, were investigated among 384 participants. Upon analysis, the average overall knowledge score was estimated to be 15.67 out of 20. Significant differences were found in the knowledge scores between different genders and educational levels. It was thus concluded that these knowledge gaps need to be addressed by developing different targeted health campaign strategies and interventions to increase awareness in the population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.