Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39898357›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2025

The efficacy and safety of Vonoprazan and Tegoprazan in

Ting Jin, Wei Wu, Lei Zhang, Han Xuan, Haixiang Zhang, Li Zhong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment ofThe Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2026
    Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Tetracycline for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a narrative review from quadruple to dual therapy.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Efficacy and Safety of Tegoprazan inPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Acid peptic disorder compass: An Indian expert consensus on comprehensive management.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Differences and trends in worldwide clinical guidelines forTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Resistance reversal: Taiwan'sWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Tegoprazan dual and quadruple therapy forFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ting JinGastroenterology Department, The First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4273-6793
Wei WuGastroenterology Department, The First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7202-1652
Lei ZhangGastroenterology Department, The First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6983-8951
Han XuanGastroenterology Department, The First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3367-2341
Haixiang ZhangGastroenterology Department, The First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9900-9299
Li ZhongGastroenterology Department, The First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District, 199 Shixin South Road, Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311200, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9608-7866

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB)-based therapies are emerging as promising alternatives for eradicating Objectives: This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of P-CAB-based therapies, including Vonoprazan (VPZ) and Tegoprazan (TPZ), compared to PPI-based therapies for Design: Meta-analysis. Data sources and methods: Comprehensive searches were conducted in major databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, up to January 1, 2024. The primary outcome was the eradication rate, analyzed by intention-to-treat (ITT). Secondary outcomes included adverse events. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the χ Results: The analysis totally included 28 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 37 studies and 8818 patients diagnosed with Conclusion: P-CAB-based therapies are more effective than traditional PPI-based treatments for eradicating PROSPERO registration: CRD42024503665.

Indexed as

adverse eventseradicationHelicobacter pyloriTegoprazanVonoprazan

Identifiers

PMID39898357
PMCPMC11783504

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.