ReviewNeuro-oncology2025
Molecular subtypes of adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas.
Review in Neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gamma Knife treatment of papillary craniopharyngioma: a single-center study of tumor control and predictors of progression.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Extracellular Vesicle-Mediated Communication in Sellar Tumors: A Conceptual and Translational Framework.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Spatially Resolved Multiomics Reveals Metabolic Remodeling and Autophagy Activation in Adamantinomatous Craniopharyngiomas.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Evaluating temozolomide for pediatric adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas using microspheroid-based drug screening.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Systemic Molecularly Targeted Therapies for Neoadjuvant and Salvage Craniopharyngioma: A Contemporary Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Targeted therapy of papillary craniopharyngioma.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Recent advances in craniopharyngioma pathophysiology and emerging therapeutic approaches.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma (ACP) is the most common benign tumor in the sellar region of children and originates from embryonic remnants. Owing to its unique location and frequent tight adhesion to and invasion of surrounding structures, the ACP poses significant challenges for neurosurgical treatment. Traditionally, the core treatment for ACPs has been surgical resection supplemented with radiotherapy in cases of residual or recurrent tumors. As a result, ACP classification has been based primarily on the tumor's relationship with surrounding anatomical and histological structures, guiding the selection of surgical approaches and the prevention of complications. Moreover, efforts to explore pharmacological treatments for ACP have yielded varying results across different cases, creating confusion among researchers. This variability also suggests the possibility of different molecular subtypes within ACPs, despite being driven by a single-gene mutation. With advancements in molecular biological studies, such as ACP RNA sequencing, whole-exome sequencing, and methylation analysis, along with the discovery of interactions between different molecular pathways within ACP, researchers have been continuously exploring the molecular subtyping of ACP and predicting the efficacy of targeted therapies on the basis of these subtypes. This review focuses on summarizing and synthesizing the molecular mechanisms and potential subtypes of ACP, aiming to provide theoretical support for future research on the molecular subtyping of ACP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.