ArticleMolecular diversity2025
Evaluation of selected indigenous spices- and herbs-derived small molecules as potential inhibitors of SREBP and its implications for breast cancer using MD simulations and MMPBSA calculations.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thermostability engineering of microbial transglutaminase using artificial intelligence and investigation of its underlying mechanisms.Bioresources and bioprocessing · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we conducted an extensive analysis of 252 bioactive compounds derived from native spices and herbs for their potential anti-breast cancer activity against sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP), using in silico techniques. To evaluate the oral bioavailability, overall pharmacokinetics, and safety profiles of these compounds, we employed Lipinski's rule of five and ADME descriptors, which depicted 66 lead molecules. These molecules were then docked with the SREBP using molecular docking tools, which revealed that diosgenin and smilagenin were the most promising hits compared to the reference inhibitor betulin, with average binding affinities of - 7.42 and - 7.37 kcal/mol and - 6.27 kcal/mol, respectively. To further assess the stability of these complexes along with betulin, we conducted molecular dynamics simulations over a 100 ns simulation period. We employed various parameters, including the root-mean-square deviation, root-mean-square fluctuation, solvent-accessible surface area, free energy of solvation, and radius of gyration, followed by principal component analysis. Furthermore, we evaluated the toxicity of the selected compounds against various anticancer cell lines, as well as their metabolic activity related to CYP450 metabolism and biological activity spectrum. Based on these results, both molecules exhibited promising drug candidate potential and could be utilized for further experimental analysis to elucidate their anticancer potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39899124What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.