ArticleMolecular diagnosis & therapy2025
Identification of Somatic Genetic Variants in Superficial Vascular Malformations by Liquid Biopsy in a Cohort of 88 Patients from a French Hospital.
Article in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Somatic Driver to Molecular Therapy in Retinal, Choroidal and Periocular Vascular Disease: Mosaicism, Targetable Pathways and Ocular Toxicity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Evolving biopsy strategies for molecular profiling of brain arteriovenous malformations.Angiogenesis · 2026Review
- Factors influencing somatic genetic testing for vascular anomalies at 2 academic centers.Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis · 2026Article
- Detection rate and mutational landscape in extracranial arteriovenous malformations: a cohort study.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Ultra-deep targeted next-generation sequencing with peripheral blood in patients with vascular malformations: a cohort of 40 patients.Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
- Harnessing liquid biopsy to unveil RAS-MEK pathway somatic pathogenic variants in extracranial arterio-venous malformations.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Ilizarov-assisted periosteal distraction for refractory arteriovenous malformation ulcers: first clinical report in Asia.Hereditas · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveSuperficial vascular anomalies are complex disorders characterized by abnormal vascular growth. Next-generation sequencing has recently identified somatic genetic alterations associated with these malformations, offering new insights for targeted treatments. However, tissue biopsies for genetic testing can be invasive and difficult to obtain, especially in arteriovenous malformations (AVM) with hemorrhagic risks. A liquid biopsy, a non-invasive approach, offers a promising solution by detecting genetic mutations in cell-free DNA. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using a liquid biopsy for the genetic analysis of patients with superficial vascular anomalies through cell-free DNA sampling. Additionally, it explored whether specific sampling sites, such as the afferent artery, nidus, and efferent vein, could enhance the sensitivity of detecting pathogenic variants in patients with AVM.
methodsA total of 88 patients were enrolled, including 55 with AVM and 33 with lymphatic malformations. For patients with AVM, cell-free DNA samples were collected from peripheral blood, efferent veins, afferent arteries, and the AVM nidus. In patients with lymphatic malformations, cystic lymphatic fluid was collected by a direct puncture during diagnostic procedures. A molecular analysis was performed using a targeted gene panel relevant to somatic alterations in solid tumors. Pathogenic variants were validated by digital polymerase chain reaction for patients with lymphatic malformations.
resultsPathogenic variants were identified in 23.6% of patients with AVM, predominantly in MAP2K1 and KRAS genes, with higher sensitivity near the AVM nidus. In addition, pathogenic variants were identified in 27.3% of patients with lymphatic malformations, all involving the PIK3CA gene. Despite the lower sensitivity of a cell-free DNA analysis compared with a tissue biopsy, especially in patients with AVM, the detection rate suggests the utility for a cell-free DNA analysis, particularly when a tissue biopsy is not feasible.
conclusionsThis study confirms the feasibility of using a cell-free DNA liquid biopsy for genotyping patients with superficial vascular anomalies, although a tissue biopsy remains the gold standard for comprehensive genetic profiling because of its higher sensitivity. A liquid biopsy offers a non-invasive option for molecular analysis that is useful as a preliminary or alternative approach when direct tissue sampling is not possible. Importantly, the sensitivity of cell-free DNA sampling in AVM appeared highest when obtained close to the nidus, indicating an optimal sampling location for future studies. Further research is needed to improve detection sensitivity, especially for samples taken near the nidus, to validate and strengthen these findings. Although our study focused on superficial/extra-cranial AVM, further research should assess the applicability of this approach to cerebral AVM, where a tissue biopsy is particularly risky.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39899252What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.