Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39899711›Full record

SynthesisProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Evidence for domain-general arousal from semantic and neuroimaging meta-analyses reconciles opposing views on arousal.

Magdalena Sabat, Charles de Dampierre, Catherine Tallon-Baudry

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Evidence for domain-general arousal from semantic and neuroimaging meta-analyses reconciles opposing views on arousal.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Real-time fMRI-triggered experience-sampling: a proof-of-concept study.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neural Sensitivity to the Heartbeat Is Modulated by Fluctuations in Affective Arousal during Spontaneous Thought.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Magdalena SabatLaboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, Département d'études cognitives, INSERM, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris Sciences Lettres University, Paris 75005, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2180-2566
Charles de DampierreInstitut Jean Nicod, CNRS, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Département d'études cognitives, École normale supérieure, Paris Sciences Lettres University, Paris 75005, France.ORCID 0009-0008-2687-7210
Catherine Tallon-BaudryLaboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, Département d'études cognitives, INSERM, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris Sciences Lettres University, Paris 75005, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8480-5831

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) ANR-17-EURE-0017Canadian Institute For Advance Research (CIFAR) program in Brain, Mind, and Consiousness NACNRS-University of Tokyo NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arousal refers to changes in brain-body state underpinning motivated behavior but lacks a proper definition and taxonomy. Neuroscience and psychology textbooks offer surprisingly different views on what arousal is, from a global brain-wide modulation of neuronal activity to a multidimensional construct, with specific brain-body patterns tuned to a given situation. The huge number of scientific articles mentioning arousal (~50,000) highlights the importance of the concept but also explains why such a vast literature has never been systematically reviewed so far. Here, we leverage the tools of natural language processing to probe the nature of arousal in a data-driven, comprehensive manner. We show that arousal comes in seven varieties: cognitive, emotional, physiological, sexual, related to stress disorders, to sleep, or to sleep disorders. We then ask whether domain-general arousal exists at the cortical level, and run meta-analyses of the brain imaging literature to reveal that all varieties of arousal, except arousal in sleep disorders for lack of data, converge onto a cortical network composed of the presupplementary motor area and the left and right dorsal anterior insula. More precisely, we find that activity in dysgranular insular area 7 (Jülich atlas), the region with the highest convergence across varieties of arousal, is also specifically associated with arousal. The domain-general arousal network might trigger the reorganization of large-scale brain networks-a global mechanism-resulting in a context-specific configuration-in line with the multidimensional view. Future taxonomies of arousal refining the alignment between concepts and data should include domain-general arousal as a central component.

Indexed as

ArousalBrainNeuroimagingBrain MappingEmotionsHumansSemanticsarousalmeta-analysisnatural language processingresting-state neural networkssemantic analysis

Identifiers

PMID39899711
PMCPMC11831115

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.