Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39900000›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Muscular Injury Is a Risk Factor for Post-Entire Circumferential Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Stricture.

Daisuke Azuma, Kingo Hirasawa, Reo Atsusaka, Yuichiro Ozeki, Atsushi Sawada, Masafumi Nishio, Ryosuke Kobayashi, Chiko Sato, Shin Maeda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. After JCOG1217: Toward Risk-Adapted Steroid Prophylaxis for Post-ESD Esophageal Strictures.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Risk Factors and Prophylaxis for Post-Procedural Stricture After Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daisuke AzumaDivision of Endoscopy, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Kingo HirasawaDivision of Endoscopy, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Reo AtsusakaDivision of Endoscopy, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Yuichiro OzekiDivision of Endoscopy, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Atsushi SawadaDivision of Endoscopy, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Masafumi NishioDivision of Endoscopy, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Ryosuke KobayashiDivision of Endoscopy, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Chiko SatoDivision of Endoscopy, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Shin MaedaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become a widely adopted treatment for early esophageal cancer. However, extensive mucosal defects resulting from ESD pose a significant risk of post-procedural strictures. Despite efforts to prevent strictures through various means, including steroid administration, they remain a challenge, significantly impacting patients' quality of life and healthcare costs. Thus, identifying risk factors for refractory strictures following entire circumferential esophageal ESD (EC-E-ESD) is imperative.

methodsBetween July 2013 and September 2023, 49 patients who underwent EC-E-ESD were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified based on the presence of refractory or non-refractory strictures. A refractory stricture was defined as requiring six or more endoscopic balloon dilation procedures before stricture improvement. Clinicopathological features and outcomes were examined using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

resultsRefractory strictures were observed in 51% of patients. A comparison showed that the refractory group had a significantly higher percentage of muscular injury (52% vs. 8%, p = 0.002) and mucosal defect length ≥50 mm (68% vs. 37%, p = 0.047) than the non-refractory group. Multivariate analysis showed that muscular injury (odds ratio 16.2; 95% confidence interval: 2.04-129.1) was an independent risk factor for refractory strictures after EC-E-ESD.

conclusionsMuscular injury during EC-E-ESD is a risk factor for refractory strictures. Strategies to prevent injury, such as meticulous dissection techniques and effective steroid administration, may mitigate this risk. However, current prophylactic measures are inadequate, highlighting the need for further research into preventive strategies.

introductionEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become a widely adopted treatment for early esophageal cancer. However, extensive mucosal defects resulting from ESD pose a significant risk of post-procedural strictures. Despite efforts to prevent strictures through various means, including steroid administration, they remain a challenge, significantly impacting patients' quality of life and healthcare costs. Thus, identifying risk factors for refractory strictures following entire circumferential esophageal ESD (EC-E-ESD) is imperative.

methodsBetween July 2013 and September 2023, 49 patients who underwent EC-E-ESD were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified based on the presence of refractory or non-refractory strictures. A refractory stricture was defined as requiring six or more endoscopic balloon dilation procedures before stricture improvement. Clinicopathological features and outcomes were examined using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

resultsRefractory strictures were observed in 51% of patients. A comparison showed that the refractory group had a significantly higher percentage of muscular injury (52% vs. 8%, p = 0.002) and mucosal defect length ≥50 mm (68% vs. 37%, p = 0.047) than the non-refractory group. Multivariate analysis showed that muscular injury (odds ratio 16.2; 95% confidence interval: 2.04-129.1) was an independent risk factor for refractory strictures after EC-E-ESD.

conclusionsMuscular injury during EC-E-ESD is a risk factor for refractory strictures. Strategies to prevent injury, such as meticulous dissection techniques and effective steroid administration, may mitigate this risk. However, current prophylactic measures are inadequate, highlighting the need for further research into preventive strategies.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal StenosisPostoperative ComplicationsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsEndoscopic balloon dilationEndoscopic submucosal dissectionEsophageal cancerEsophageal strictureSteroids

Identifiers

PMID39900000
PMCPMC11965824

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.