Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39900321›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pain2025

Development and preliminary testing of a comprehensive Ecological Momentary Assessment of people with chronic pain.

Doerte U Junghaenel, Roger B Fillingim, Steven D Pratscher, Sarah Goldstein, Sean Mackey, Arthur A Stone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Doerte U JunghaenelDornsife Center for Self-Report Science and Center for Economic & Social Research, University of Southern California, CA, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, CA, USA. Electronic address: junghaen@usc.edu.
Roger B FillingimDepartment of Community Dentistry and Behavioral Science, University of Florida, FL, USA.
Steven D PratscherDepartment of Community Dentistry and Behavioral Science, University of Florida, FL, USA.
Sarah GoldsteinDornsife Center for Self-Report Science and Center for Economic & Social Research, University of Southern California, CA, USA.
Sean MackeyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Arthur A StoneDornsife Center for Self-Report Science and Center for Economic & Social Research, University of Southern California, CA, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, CA, USA.

Funding

Advancing the Science and Practice of Ecological Momentary AssessmentR37AG057685 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Arthur A Stone · 2018 to 2026
$9.4M
Prognostic biomarkers for high-impact chronic pain: Development and validationR61NS118651 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MACKEY, SEAN C · 2020 to 2020
$7.3M
the Integrative and Multidisciplinary Pain and Aging Research Training (IMPART) ProgramT32AG049673 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI FILLINGIM, ROGER B · 2015 to 2024
$3.2M
Developing and testing a multicomponent breathwork intervention for people with chronic painK01AT012066 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Steven D Pratscher · 2023 to 2026
$532k
Mentoring in Discovery and Validation of Clinical Chronic Pain BiomarkersK24NS126781 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MACKEY, SEAN C · 2021 to 2021
$324k
NCCIH NIH HHS K01 AT012066NIA NIH HHS R37 AG057685NIA NIH HHS T32 AG049673NINDS NIH HHS K24 NS126781NINDS NIH HHS R61 NS118651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) is a data collection method to understand people's real-time experience in daily life. To date, no standard instrument exists to measure the pain experience using EMA that provides relevant information for most chronic pain conditions. The goal of this study was to fill this gap by developing a comprehensive EMA pain instrument (cEMAp). Drawing on extant validated retrospective pain measures, the items represented the following pain-relevant constructs: (1) pain intensity, (2) pain fluctuations and patterns, (3) time in pain, (4) pain sensations, (5) pain location, (6) focusing on pain and distraction, (7) pain behavior, (8) other pain sensations, (9) pain impact, (10) pain concerns, (11) causes of pain relief and exacerbations, and (12) pain typicality. Subsequently, interviews with fifty-three adults (mean age=57 years, SD=13.4; female: 74%) with chronic pain were conducted to confirm the relevance and appropriateness of the selected items for real-time pain measurement. We then created an electronic version of the instrument utilizing information from 2-h intervals. We examined its feasibility and acceptability in a 1-week EMA design in a separate sample of twenty adults with chronic pain (mean age=56 years, SD=14.2). Results showed that EMA completion time was reasonable (mean=3.8 min, SD=2.5). Participants reported that the prompts were non-disruptive, the questions overall captured their pain experience, and the frequent pain assessments were useful. We expect this new instrument will allow researchers and clinicians to paint a fine-grained and nuanced picture of people's everyday pain in a comprehensive and standardized way. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents the development of a new pain assessment based on Ecological Momentary Assessment to comprehensively measure chronic pain in daily life. Continued use and examination of the new instrument could facilitate standardization and comparability of momentary pain assessment methods across studies and chronic pain conditions.

Indexed as

Chronic PainEcological Momentary AssessmentPain MeasurementAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedChronic painEcological momentary assessmentInstrument developmentPain assessmentStakeholder interviews

Identifiers

PMID39900321
PMCPMC11925663

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.