ArticleMedical physics2025
4D Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast CT: Phantom-based reconstruction parameter optimization for iodine quantification.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modular breast and tumor perfusion phantoms for 4D dynamic contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT.Medical physics · 2025Article
- 4D Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast CT: Phantom-based reconstruction parameter optimization for iodine quantification.Medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFour-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced breast CT (4D DCE-bCT) offers promising high-resolution spatial and temporal imaging capabilities for the characterization and monitoring of breast tumors. However, the optimal combination of parameters for iodine quantification in image space remains to be determined. PURPOSE: This study aims to optimize a dedicated bCT system to perform long dynamic contrast-enhanced scans with high spatio-temporal resolution while maintaining a reasonable radiation dose.
methodsOur protocol includes the acquisition of a high-quality prior image that is reconstructed with a polychromatic iterative algorithm (IMPACT). The acquisition of the post-contrast sequence is continuous but sparse and these images are reconstructed using prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS). A four-step optimization process is performed using images of a physical phantom. First, the optimal tube current is selected by taking the noise level into account. Second, the optimal number of angles is selected based on the absence of streak artifacts. Third, the number of iterations in IMPACT is specified at the lowest value that achieves the highest spatial resolution. Finally, the number of iterations in PICCS is determined based on the quantitative accuracy of a range of iodine concentrations.
resultsWhen a high-quality prior image is available, the imaging of post-contrast images can be performed using just 40 projection angles with a tube current of 32 mA. The noise level in the post-contrast images is inherited from the prior image and no streak artifacts are visible. Mean difference between the linear attenuation coefficients of samples containing iodine reconstructed with IMPACT using all 360 projections and PICCS using 40 projections is 0.0004
conclusionsThis study found the optimal acquisition and reconstruction parameters for a low-dose dynamic contrast-enhanced bCT protocol. The numerical accuracy of the proposed protocol was ensured by performing a physical phantom study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.