ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Estimating the association between cigarette and e-cigarette use patterns and SARS-CoV-2 negative conversion time: retrospective online survey in China.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCigarette smoking has been reported to be associated with SARS-CoV-2 negative conversion, while little is known about the effect of its dual use with e-cigarettes. This study aimed to investigate whether tobacco product use patterns including e-cigarette use were linked with delayed negative conversion of SARS-CoV-2.
methodsAn online national survey was conducted from January 28 through February 21, 2023, targeting a community-based population in mainland of China after peak waves of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Participants were followed from the onset of COVID-19 symptoms until the negative conversion day or the day of answering the questionnaire as the endpoint of the study. Multi-variable adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare the negative conversion time of SARS-CoV-2 across different cigarette and e-cigarette use patterns.
resultsA total of 66,537 participants infected with COVID-19 were enrolled and 13,294 were included in the analyses. During the median duration of 7 days (interquartile range 5 to 10 days), a total of 11,587 (87.2%) had a negative conversion. Compared with never users, current exclusive smokers (multi-variable adjusted HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.48-0.71), current dual users (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.22-0.44), and previous smokers (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.37-0.83) took longer to turn negative after 10 days of follow-up.
conclusionsBoth current exclusive cigarette use and dual use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes were associated with the delayed negative conversion of SARS-CoV-2, which strengthens the importance of smoking and vaping cessation messaging and community-based tobacco control strategies during pandemics like COVID-19 next time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.