Evidence mapPaperPMID 39901141Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Effective dietary interventions during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of behavior change techniques to promote healthy eating.

Hannah O'Connor, Nina Meloncelli, Shelley A Wilkinson, Anna Mae Scott, Lisa Vincze, Alita Rushton, Samantha Dawson, Jenna Hollis, Bree Whiteoak, Sarah Gauci and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Maternal Nutrition, Toxicants, and Epigenetic Programming of Obesity Across Generations.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hannah O'ConnorFaculty of Medicine, Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia. h.oconnor@uq.edu.au.
Nina MeloncelliFaculty of Medicine, Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.
Shelley A WilkinsonSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Anna Mae ScottNuffield Department of Population Health, The University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
Lisa VinczeSchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Southport, QLD, Australia.
Alita RushtonChief Allied Health Practitioner, Metro North Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Samantha DawsonFood & Mood Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Jenna HollisHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Bree WhiteoakCentre for Childhood Nutrition Research, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Sarah GauciFood & Mood Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Susan de JerseyFaculty of Medicine, Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving dietary intake during pregnancy can mitigate adverse consequences for women and their children. The effective techniques and features for supporting and sustaining dietary change during pregnancy and postpartum are minimally reported. The primary aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to summarise the effectiveness of dietary interventions for pregnant woman, identify which behaviour change techniques (BCTs) and intervention features were most frequently used and determine which were most effective at improving dietary intake. Six databases were searched to identify randomised control trials (RCTs) reporting on dietary intake in pregnant women over the age of sixteen, with an active intervention group compared to a control group receiving usual care or less intensive interventions. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 1 was used to assess study validity. BCTs were coded by two authors using Michie et al.'s BCT taxonomy V1. A random effect model assessed intervention effects on indices of dietary quality and food groups (fruit, vegetables, grains and cereals, meat, and dairy) in relation to the use of BCTs and intervention features. Thirty- seven RCTs met the inclusion criteria. High heterogeneity was observed across intervention characteristics and measures of fidelity. Only half of the available BCTs were used, with eleven used once. The BCT category Reward and threat was successful in improving dietary quality and vegetable intake, whilst 'Action planning' (1.4) from the category Goals and planning significantly improved dietary quality. Interventions delivered by a nutrition professional and those that included group sessions improved dietary quality more than those delivered by other health professionals, research staff, or application-delivered interventions and delivered via other modalities. Future dietary interventions during pregnancy should incorporate and report on BCTs used in the intervention. Successful design elements for improving antenatal dietary intake may include multimodal interventions delivered by nutrition professionals and the use of Rewards and Goal setting.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyDiet, HealthyHealth PromotionPrenatal CareFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntenatal interventionsBehaviourBehaviour change techniquesDietMeta-analysisPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID39901141
PMCPMC11792301

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.