ArticleJournal of ovarian research2025
Asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 infection in women prior to oocyte retrieval has no impact on embryo laboratory outcomes: a retrospective study.
Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFew previous studies have addressed the impact of COVID-19 infection status on assisted reproductive technology outcomes. The purpose of this study was to assess whether COVID-19 infection affects ovulation induction outcomes and the laboratory outcomes of women undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment.
methodsIn total, 363 patients were divided into three groups: the COVID-19 infection group (group A, n = 49), the COVID-19 recovery group (group B, n = 119) and the COVID-19 non-infection group (group C, n = 195). Intergroup comparisons of baseline characteristics, stimulation characteristics and laboratory outcomes were performed.
resultsThe Gn dosage in group A was significantly higher than those in groups B and C. The duration of Gn treatment was longer in group A than in group B. In group B, the number of high-quality blastocysts was lower than that in group C. The rates of blastocyst formation (42.56%) and high-quality blastocyst formation (12.05%) in group B were significantly lower than those in group A (51.51%; P = 0.003, 16.58%; P = 0.026) and C (48.20%; P = 0.005, 16.49%; P = 0.002). The high-quality blastocyst rate in group C (34.20%) was the highest and was different from that in group B (28.33%). The main risk factor for high-quality blastocyst formation according to multivariate logistic regression analysis was recovery from COVID-19 (0.599, 95% CI: 0.360-0.996; P = 0.048).
conclusionAsymptomatic or mild COVID-19 infection prior to oocyte retrieval may not has a significant negative effect on ovulation induction outcomes or laboratory outcomes, although the number of Gn days and dose of Gn may increase. In addition, we should pay attention to infertile women recovering from COVID-19 infection and be aware of the significant reduction in the number of high-quality blastocysts in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.