ArticleSmall methods2025
Folding Competition and Dynamic Transformation in DNA Origami: Parallel Versus Antiparallel Crossovers.
Article in Small methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Folding Competition and Dynamic Transformation in DNA Origami: Parallel Versus Antiparallel Crossovers.Small methods · 2025Article
- Isothermal assembly of DNA nanostructures.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA is a versatile abiomaterial for constructing nanostructures with biomedical and biotechnological applications. Among the methods available, DNA origami is a robust and widely recognized technique. Traditionally, most origami designs adopt antiparallel crossovers in both scaffold and staple strands, with less emphasis on parallel crossovers, which offer advantages like enhanced nuclease resistance and single-strand routing potential. Here, a DNA origami nanostructure is designed, featuring two rotational panels that can be locked into configurations based on either antiparallel or parallel crossovers. By systematically varying the length and arrangement of these key staples, 36 pairs of antiparallel and parallel designs are studied in competitive folding tests, providing insights into the relative preference for each design. The 12 antiparallel and parallel designs are ranked, their folding pathways are examined, and nuclease resistance is assessed. The results reveal that the arrangement of staples near the central scaffold crossover is crucial for shifting between parallel and antiparallel conformations. Additionally, a two-way isothermal transformation between antiparallel and parallel origami driven by toehold-mediated displacement reactions is demonstrated, highlighting the potential of parallel designs as dynamic nanodevices for temperature-sensitive environments. This study offers valuable insights into - dynamics in antiparallel and parallel DNA origami, opening opportunities for designing nanodevices based on parallel crossovers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.