ReviewFrontiers in immunology2024
A practical guide to FAIR data management in the age of multi-OMICS and AI.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Omics-Guided Design and Safety Engineering of Nucleic Acid Therapeutics: From Molecular Perturbation to Predictive Toxicology and Precision Translation.Chemical biology & drug design · 2026Review
- The Oral-Gut-Immune-Nutrition Axis in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Plying potency assays for immunotherapy of solid tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in modern clinical practice (Review).Medicine internationalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multi-cellular biological systems, including the immune system, are highly complex, dynamic, and adaptable. Systems biologists aim to understand such complexity at a quantitative level. However, these ambitious efforts are often limited by access to a variety of high-density intra-, extra- and multi-cellular measurements resolved in time and space and across a variety of perturbations. The advent of automation, OMICs and single-cell technologies now allows high dimensional multi-modal data acquisition from the same biological samples multiplexed at scale (multi-OMICs). As a result, systems biologists -theoretically- have access to more data than ever. However, the mathematical frameworks and computational tools needed to analyze and interpret such data are often still nascent, limiting the biological insights that can be obtained without years of computational method development and validation. More pressingly, much of the data sits in silos in formats that are incomprehensible to other scientists or machines limiting its value to the vaster scientific community, especially the computational biologists tasked with analyzing these vast amounts of data in more nuanced ways. With the rapid development and increasing interest in using artificial intelligence (AI) for the life sciences, improving how biologic data is organized and shared is more pressing than ever for scientific progress. Here, we outline a practical approach to multi-modal data management and FAIR sharing, which are in line with the latest US and EU funders' data sharing policies. This framework can help extend the longevity and utility of data by allowing facile use and reuse, accelerating scientific discovery in the biomedical sciences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.