ArticleNeurology. Genetics2025
Mild Malformation of Cortical Development With Oligodendroglial Hyperplasia and Epilepsy: A Systematic Review.
Article in Neurology. Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The role of AI-assisted drug repurposing in neurological disorders: a systematic review of validation strategies, challenges and opportunities.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Pooled it
- Combination of stereo-electroencephalography and electrocorticography to manage mild malformation of cortical development with oligodendroglial hyperplasia and epilepsy (MOGHE): a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Mild malformation of cortical development with oligodendroglial hyperplasia in epilepsy (MOGHE): genetics, mechanisms and precision therapy.Acta neuropathologica · 2026Review
- Case Report: Early surgical intervention for epilepsy with mild MOGHE: timing and clinical efficacy.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Mild malformation of cortical development with oligodendroglial hyperplasia and epilepsy (MOGHE) is a newly described rare entity of drug-resistant epilepsy, with a wide spectrum of presentations. We aim to describe the diagnostic features and prognosis of MOGHE in a large cohort. Methods: We performed a systematic review preregistered on PROSPERO (CRD42023472978), in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and ScienceDirect between database inception and November 30, 2023, for all published studies on MOGHE. Inclusion criteria were a histopathologic diagnosis of MOGHE. The risk of bias was analyzed with a standardized tool specifically for case reports and case series. The demographic, clinical, EEG, neuroimaging, genetic, and neuropathologic features; treatments; and prognosis were extracted and analyzed. Subgroup analysis was performed with the age at onset and Results: A total of 163 patients with MOGHE from 18 studies were included in the analysis. The median age at seizure onset was 1.2 years, and 103 were male. Ninety-five patients presented with unilobed lesions. Ninety-nine had lesions in the frontal lobe. A total of 101 patients achieved a favorable surgical outcome. Patients with an onset before 10 years were more likely to present with epileptic spasms, the West syndrome, a circumscribed pattern of interictal EEG, intellectual disabilities, and a better seizure outcome, compared with those with an onset age 10 years and older. Forty-five patients (72.6%) were Discussion: MOGHE is a distinct entity of drug-resistant epilepsy associated with
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.