ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2025
Relationship between 10 repetition maximum for chest press, leg press, and muscle mass measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis in healthy young adults.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study aimed to examine the relationship between bioelectrical impedance analysis measurements and 10 repetition maximum for chest press and leg press, and to develop a regression model to determine if bioelectrical impedance analysis can predict 10 repetition maximum in healthy young adults. [Participants and Methods] Ninety-four healthy adults participated in the study. Correlations between 10 repetition maximum and bioelectrical impedance analysis measurements were calculated, and simple linear regression was performed using bioelectrical impedance analysis measurements as independent variables to develop 10 repetition maximum prediction models. [Results] Significant correlations were found between 10 repetition maximum and bioelectrical impedance analysis measurements. The regression models for 10 repetition maximum for chest press based on upper limb muscle mass, skeletal muscle mass, and skeletal muscle mass index were Y=16.40X-13.27, Y=3.81X-36.78, and Y=20.51X-81.27, respectively. The regression models for 10 repetition maximum for leg press based on lower limb muscle mass, skeletal muscle mass, and skeletal muscle mass index were Y=12.60X-3.21, Y=8.09X-24.39, and Y=43.68X-119.60, respectively. [Conclusion] These findings may contribute to developing a safe and efficient method for measuring 10 repetition maximum, which can be useful in resistance training prescriptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.