Observational studyEuropean radiology2025
Lower extremity MRI: are their requests always appropriate in France?
Observational study in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe primary aim is to assess current lower extremity MRI requests' relevance with a secondary focus on the knee. MATERIALS AND
methodsUsing data from the National Health Data System (SNDS), we conducted an observational study of adults (18+) who underwent lower extremity MRI between July 1 and December 31, 2021. This study included analyzing medical consultations and imaging procedures (particularly X-rays) in the 6 months before and after the index MRI, as well as medical procedures and hospitalizations related to knee procedures within 6 months post-MRI.
resultsDuring the study period, 779,721 adults underwent lower extremity MRI, marking a 76% increase compared to a previous study conducted in 2012. General practitioners requested MRI in 70.5% of cases, often as the primary imaging modality. Notably, 52.1% of patients had not undergone lower extremity X-rays in the 6 months preceding MRI, and 13% underwent at least two MRI examinations within a year. Focusing on the knee, most patients (80%) did not undergo any outpatient medical procedure or hospitalization involving the knee within the 6 months post MRI.
conclusionIn France, lower extremity MRI, particularly knee MRI, is frequently used as a first-line imaging procedure, unlike what is recommended. KEY POINTS: Question How often are requests for lower extremity MRI examinations appropriate? Findings Lower extremity MRI is often performed as a first-line imaging procedure, even though it is not recommended. Clinical relevance The study findings underscore the importance of disseminating guidelines regarding lower extremity MRI appropriateness to increase its availability for appropriate purposes, thereby improving patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.