ArticleRheumatology international2025
Early detection of rheumatoid arthritis through patient empowerment by tailored digital monitoring and education: a feasibility study.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- RhePort 1.3 enhances early identification of inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a prospective study in German rheumatology settings.Rheumatology international · 2025Trial
- Digital monitoring in rheumatoid arthritis: remote assessment, wearables, and data-driven disease management.Current opinion in rheumatology · 2026Review
- Healthcare Interventions in the Management of Rheumatic Diseases: A Narrative Analysis of Effectiveness and Emerging Strategies.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Potentials and barriers of digital patient education in rheumatic disease management: an exploratory qualitative interview study.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients at risk for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) describe fluctuating and nonspecific symptoms, making it difficult to quantify symptom burden and recognize RA progression. This study aimed to assess feasibility and diagnostic value of a multimodal digital self-monitoring program in preclinical RA. This prospective cohort study included individuals at-risk for RA, who first watched self-produced educational videos about (preclinical) RA and joint self-examination techniques and then started the REMOTRA symptom monitoring. Key outcomes measured included patient acceptance (Net Promoter Score: NPS), monitoring program usability (System usability scale: SUS), monitoring adherence, diagnostic accuracy, and reported symptom burden. A total of 43 participants (65.9% female, mean age 50.1 years) were enrolled. The educational and self-examination videos received NPS ratings of 54.4 and 31.6, respectively. The monitoring software received usability scores of 88.1/100 (SD: 5.5) at three months and 85.4/100 (SD: 16.0) at 6 months. 24/41 (58.5%) completed all questionnaires, and the average app usage was 4.8 months (SD: 1.8). None of the patients with a REMOTRA score below 10 developed RA, yielding a negative predictive value and sensitivity of 100%. However, the positive predictive value was 12%, and the specificity was 42.1%. Analgesic and cortisone usage was reported by 58.5% and 29.3% of participants, respectively. The strong patient acceptance, ease of use, and high adherence rates, combined with encouraging diagnostic outcomes, underscore the potential of this personalized digital monitoring and education approach. These findings suggest that further validation through multicenter studies is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.