ReviewComprehensive Physiology2025
The Role of Chronic Stress in the Pathogenesis of Ischemic Heart Disease in Women.
Review in Comprehensive Physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of psychological support strategies on clinical outcomes and quality of life in patients with chronic heart disease: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Trial
- Differential associations of oxidative stress parameters with neuroendocrine markers and hemodynamic reactivity in acute mental stress-induced adrenergic reactivity profiles: The SABPA study.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Different forms of cardiomyocyte death in post-myocardial infarction ventricular remodeling: mechanisms and therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Psychological stress has emerged as a critical risk factor for cardiovascular disease, especially in women. While female participation in clinical research has improved, sex-specific data analysis and reporting often remain inadequate, limiting our ability to draw definitive conclusions for women. Conversely, preclinical studies consistently demonstrate adverse effects of stress on female health, yet the molecular mechanisms underlying this association remain elusive. Evidence suggests that female IHD pathogenesis is more complex than in males, involving multiple factors, including inflammation, contractile dysfunction, bioenergetic impairment, and remodeling. However, many of these mechanisms are primarily derived from male studies, and molecular investigations in female models are limited, hindering our understanding of the underlying biological pathways. This is particularly concerning given the increasing prevalence of ischemic heart disease in postmenopausal women. In order to fully elucidate the impact of stress on female cardiac health and develop targeted interventions, further preclinical research on female models is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.